CVE-2024-57395
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPassword Vulnerability in Safety production process management system v1.0 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges, execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the password and account number parameters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical password vulnerability in Safety production process management system v1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the password and account number parameters to bypass authentication, escalate privileges to administrative levels, execute arbitrary code on the underlying system, and exfiltrate sensitive data. The CVSS 9.8 score indicates trivial exploitability with complete system compromise potential.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Safety production process management system is deployedInventory your network for web applications named or related to 'Safety production process management' or industrial process control systems. Check running web services, reverse proxies, or hosted applications for this specific software.Affected if The system is installed and accessible on the network.
-
Confirm the software versionLocate the version information for the Safety production process management system. Check application headers, about pages, source files, or administrative interfaces for version v1.0. Compare against the affected version range.Affected if The installed version is v1.0 or falls within any affected version range provided.
-
Verify authentication endpoint exposureIdentify the login or authentication endpoints for this application (commonly /login, /auth, /admin/login, or similar paths). Determine if these endpoints are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if The authentication interface is exposed to network access without proper network segmentation.
-
Inspect authentication mechanism for parameter manipulationExamine the login form parameters, particularly those handling 'username', 'password', 'account', or 'account number' fields. Test if these parameters accept arbitrary input that could bypass authentication logic.Affected if The login mechanism allows manipulation of password or account number parameters to bypass verification.
-
Review logs for authentication anomaliesExamine application and web server logs for failed login attempts, successful logins from unusual IP addresses, or privilege escalation events, especially targeting administrative functions.Affected if Logs show unauthorized authentication successes, privilege escalation, or unexpected administrative access.
A user is affected if the Safety production process management system v1.0 is running with its authentication interface exposed and the login mechanism permits manipulation of account/password parameters to bypass verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately restrict network access to the affected system, investigate and remediate the authentication mechanism vulnerability (likely SQL injection, hardcoded credentials, or authentication bypass), and audit for any indicators of compromise before allowing resumed production use.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-57395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-57395 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data