CVE-2024-57608
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Via Browser 6.1.0 allows a a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the mark.via.Shell component.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVia Browser 6.1.0 contains a vulnerability in the mark.via.Shell component that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, likely due to improper input validation or insufficient access controls on this exported Android component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Via Browser versionOpen Android Settings > Apps > Via Browser and view the version number under 'App info', or use a package manager to query: `adb shell pm list packages -f | grep via.browser` then check the APK versionAffected if The installed version is 6.1.0 exactly
-
Verify mark.via.Shell component is exportedUse ADB to query the component's export status: `adb shell dumpsys package com.via.browser | grep -A 10 'mark.via.Shell'` or decompile the APK and inspect AndroidManifest.xml for android:exported="true" on the Shell componentAffected if The component shows android:exported="true" or is accessible without permissions in the dumpsys output
-
Confirm component accepts external inputInspect the application's code or use a dynamic analysis tool to test if the mark.via.Shell component accepts and processes intent parameters without validation, or check if any intent filters expose it to other appsAffected if The component accepts arbitrary intent data without sanitization or lacks permission requirements like android:permission="signature"
You are affected if Via Browser version 6.1.0 is installed and the mark.via.Shell component is exported and accessible to other applications without proper validation controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Via Browser to the latest patched version. If updates are unavailable, disable or restrict access to the mark.via.Shell component through proper Android permission controls or application-level validation.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-57608 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-57608 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data