CVE-2024-6052
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStored XSS in Checkmk before versions 2.3.0p8, 2.2.0p29, 2.1.0p45, and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows users to execute arbitrary scripts by injecting HTML elements
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Checkmk allows authenticated users to inject malicious HTML/JavaScript code into input fields. The injected payload is stored on the server and executes when other users view the affected content, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or malicious actions in the context of victim users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.0= 2.1.0= 2.2.0= 2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Checkmk versionRun the command 'cmk --version' or check the Checkmk web interface footer for the version number, or look in /omd/sites/<site>/etc/versionAffected if The installed version is 2.0.0 or lower, 2.1.0, 2.2.0, or 2.3.0 (any version listed as affected)
-
Verify Checkmk web interface is activeAccess the Checkmk web interface URL and confirm you can log in as an authenticated userAffected if The web interface is accessible and you have an authenticated session, allowing you to test input fields
-
Identify input fields that accept user dataNavigate to Checkmk configuration areas such as host properties, contact definitions, notification rules, or custom macros where user input is collected and storedAffected if Input fields exist that accept and store user-supplied data without proper sanitization
-
Search for existing malicious payloads in stored dataQuery the Checkmk database (typically in /omd/sites/<site>/var/nagios/rw/nagios.qh or through the web interface) for suspicious HTML tags, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers in stored configuration valuesAffected if Any stored configuration values contain unescaped HTML or JavaScript code that could execute in another user's browser
You are affected if your Checkmk version is 2.0.0 or lower, 2.1.0, 2.2.0, or 2.3.0 and you have authenticated users who can access input fields that store and display user-supplied content without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Checkmk to version 2.3.0p8, 2.2.0p29, 2.1.0p45 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement input validation and output encoding on user-supplied fields as a compensating control.
2.3.0p8 (for 2.3.x), 2.2.0p29 (for 2.2.x), or 2.1.0p45 (for 2.1.x) - Note: 2.0.0 is End-of-Life and no patch is available
- 1. Identify your current Checkmk version by checking the about page or running 'cmk --version'
- 2. Based on your current major version (2.0.0, 2.1.0, 2.2.0, or 2.3.0), plan upgrade to the corresponding fixed patch version
- 3. Back up your Checkmk configuration and data before proceeding with the upgrade
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed patch version from checkmk.com (2.3.0p8, 2.2.0p29, or 2.1.0p45)
- 5. Follow Checkmk's standard upgrade procedure to apply the patch
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and the XSS vulnerability is patched
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,736.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6052 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data