Meetinghub Paperless MeetingsApplication · Hamastar

CVE-2024-6117

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in meeting management function in Hamastar MeetingHub Paperless Meetings 2021 allows remote authenticated users to perform arbitrary system commands via a crafted ASP file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The meeting management function in Hamastar MeetingHub Paperless Meetings 2021 suffers from an unrestricted file upload vulnerability that allows authenticated remote users to upload malicious ASP files, which can then be executed to achieve arbitrary system command execution.

MitigationImplement strict file type validation (whitelist approach), validate file content/magic bytes rather than just extensions, store uploaded files outside the webroot, disable script execution in upload directories, and apply proper authentication/authorization checks on the upload endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Meetinghub Paperless MeetingsApplication
Affected:= 2021

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm product version
    Locate the installed Hamastar MeetingHub Paperless Meetings version through the application admin panel, system information page, or productAbout/diagnostics file. Compare against version 2021.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2021 (version 2021).
  2. Identify upload endpoint exposure
    Locate the meeting management upload functionality in the web application. Check if the upload endpoint is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS without requiring authentication, or if authentication can be bypassed.
    Affected if The upload endpoint is accessible to unauthenticated users or allows authentication bypass.
  3. Review file type validation
    Inspect the upload function's code or configuration to determine if it validates file types using a whitelist, checks magic bytes/file content, or relies solely on file extension.
    Affected if The application accepts any file extension or only checks the extension without validating actual file content.
  4. Verify upload directory placement
    Check where uploaded files are stored. Determine if the upload directory is placed within the webroot (accessible via web browser) or outside it.
    Affected if Uploaded files are stored within the webroot and are web-accessible.
  5. Confirm script execution is disabled
    Inspect the web server configuration and upload directory to determine if script execution (ASP, ASPX, PHP, etc.) is permitted in the upload location.
    Affected if Script execution is enabled in the upload directory, allowing uploaded ASP files to be executed.

The environment is affected if running version 2021 of Hamastar MeetingHub Paperless Meetings with an exposed upload endpoint that lacks proper file type validation, stores uploads within the webroot, and permits script execution in the upload directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict file type validation (whitelist approach), validate file content/magic bytes rather than just extensions, store uploaded files outside the webroot, disable script execution in upload directories, and apply proper authentication/authorization checks on the upload endpoint.

Fix this in Meetinghub Paperless Meetings Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6117 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6117 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data