HaloitsmApplication · Haloservicesolutions

CVE-2024-6200

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.143.61 / 2.146.1 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HaloITSM versions up to 2.146.1 are affected by a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The injected JavaScript code can execute arbitrary action on behalf of the user accessing a ticket. HaloITSM versions past 2.146.1 (and patches starting from 2.143.61 ) fix the mentioned vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HaloITSM versions up to 2.146.1 contain a stored XSS vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into ticket data. When other users access the affected ticket, the injected script executes, allowing arbitrary actions to be performed on behalf of those users.

MitigationUpgrade HaloITSM to version 2.146.1 or later, or apply the vendor patch starting from version 2.143.61.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HaloitsmApplication
Affected:< 2.143.61>= 2.144, < 2.146.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HaloITSM version
    Locate the version number of your HaloITSM installation through the application admin interface, about page, or installation documentation. Common locations include the system administration panel or version information file within the application directory.
    Affected if The installed version is less than 2.143.61, or is greater than or equal to 2.144 but less than 2.146.1
  2. Compare version against affected ranges
    Determine if your installed version falls into any of the affected ranges: all versions below 2.143.61, or versions 2.144.x through 2.146.0. If your version is 2.146.1 or later, it is not affected.
    Affected if The installed version is in the range < 2.143.61 OR >= 2.144.0 AND < 2.146.1
  3. Inspect ticket data storage
    Examine the database or ticket records where user-submitted data is stored. Look for any ticket entries containing HTML script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or suspicious encoded content that could represent XSS payloads.
    Affected if Stored ticket data contains unescaped HTML, script tags, or JavaScript code that could execute when tickets are viewed by other users

You are affected if your HaloITSM version is below 2.143.61 or between 2.144.0 and 2.146.0 inclusive, and your ticket data contains malicious script content that would execute on user access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.143.61 / 2.146.1 or later
Fixed in 2.143.612.146.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade HaloITSM to version 2.146.1 or later, or apply the vendor patch starting from version 2.143.61.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.146.2 or later

  1. Backup the current HaloITSM installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
  2. Obtain HaloITSM version 2.146.2 or later from the official vendor (haloitsm.com)
  3. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure for HaloITSM
  4. Confirm the upgrade was successful by verifying the version number in the application
  5. Test that the stored XSS vulnerability in ticket fields is no longer exploitable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Haloitsm Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6200 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6200 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data