PlaysmsApplication

CVE-2024-6251

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in playSMS 1.4.3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /index.php?app=main&inc=feature_phonebook&op=phonebook_list of the component New Phonebook Handler. The manipulation of the argument name/email leads to basic cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-269418 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in playSMS 1.4.3 within the New Phonebook Handler component. The phonebook_list function fails to properly sanitize the name and email parameters, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when other users view the phonebook entries.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the name and email fields in the phonebook_list handler. Use context-appropriate escaping before displaying any user-supplied data in HTML output.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PlaysmsApplication
Affected:= 1.4.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify playSMS installation and version
    Locate the playSMS installation directory and check the version file or about page. Common paths include /var/www/playsms or similar web root directories. Look for version.php or version.txt files.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.4.3 or falls within the 1.4.3 release line.
  2. Verify phonebook module is enabled
    Access the playSMS admin panel and navigate to the Phonebook section. Check if the phonebook feature is accessible to users. The vulnerability exists in the New Phonebook Handler component.
    Affected if The phonebook module is enabled and accessible to at least one user role.
  3. Inspect phonebook entries for XSS payloads
    Query the phonebook database table (typically named pbk or phonebook) or view entries through the admin interface. Examine the 'name' and 'email' fields for HTML script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or encoded payloads.
    Affected if Any phonebook entry contains unescaped HTML or JavaScript in the name or email fields that could execute when viewed.
  4. Review phonebook_list function source code
    Locate the file containing the phonebook_list function in the New Phonebook Handler component. Search for the function definition and inspect how it handles the name and email parameters before output.
    Affected if The code shows no sanitization or output encoding is applied to name/email parameters before displaying them.

You are affected if playSMS version 1.4.3 is installed with the phonebook module enabled and any phonebook entries contain unsanitized script content in name or email fields.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the name and email fields in the phonebook_list handler. Use context-appropriate escaping before displaying any user-supplied data in HTML output.

Fix this in Playsms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6251 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data