CVE-2024-6327
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Progress® Telerik® Report Server versions prior to 2024 Q2 (10.1.24.709), a remote code execution attack is possible through an insecure deserialization vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceProgress Telerik Report Server versions prior to 2024 Q2 (10.1.24.709) contain an insecure deserialization vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by submitting crafted serialized objects to the application, leading to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.24.709CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Telerik Report Server versionAccess the Report Server web interface and navigate to the Help or About section, or check the version information in the installation directory (such as the assembly version of the main executable or the product's metadata file). Compare the discovered version to 10.1.24.709.Affected if The installed version is lower than 10.1.24.709.
-
Confirm Report Server is network-accessibleDetermine if the Report Server web application is exposed to network requests (internal or external). This can be verified by attempting to access the Report Server URL from a different host or by reviewing network binding configurations in IIS or the embedded web server settings.Affected if The Report Server is reachable over the network and the version is below 10.1.24.709.
-
Verify authentication is not bypassedReview the Report Server authentication configuration to confirm that unauthenticated requests are not accepted on any endpoint. Check the web.config file for authentication settings and ensure the Report Server requires valid credentials for all operational endpoints.Affected if Unauthenticated access is permitted and the version is below 10.1.24.709.
-
Inspect for signs of deserialization exploitationReview HTTP access logs and application event logs for unusual deserialization patterns, such as requests containing serialized object data (for example, Java serialized objects, JSON with unexpected type indicators, or base64-encoded payloads). Look for suspicious outgoing network connections or unexpected process execution initiated by the web application service account.Affected if Suspicious deserialization patterns appear in logs and the version is below 10.1.24.709.
You are affected if the installed Telerik Report Server version is below 10.1.24.709 and the application is accessible over the network without proper authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.1.24.709
Upgrade to Telerik Report Server 2024 Q2 (10.1.24.709) or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the Report Server interface and implement WAF rules to detect deserialization attack patterns.
Telerik Report Server 10.1.24.709 (2024 Q2) or later
- Obtain the latest Telerik Report Server installation package from the official Telerik website (www.telerik.com) or your Telerik account
- Back up your existing Telerik Report Server database and configuration files
- Stop the Telerik Report Server service
- Install version 10.1.24.709 or later (2024 Q2 release) using the standard installation process
- Verify the upgrade by checking the Report Server version in the administration interface
- Restart the Telerik Report Server service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6327 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data