CVE-2024-6979
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAmin Aliakbari, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found a broken access control which would lead to less-privileged operator- and/or viewer accounts having more privileges than designed. The risk of exploitation is very low as it requires complex steps to execute, including knowing of account passwords and social engineering attacks in tricking the administrator to perform specific configurations on operator- and/or viewer-privileged accounts. Axis has released patched AXIS OS a version for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBroken access control vulnerability in AXIS OS allows lower-privileged operator and viewer accounts to obtain elevated privileges beyond their intended permissions through specific configuration manipulations tricking administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.11.0, < 11.11.94CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AXIS OS versionAccess the device web interface or use the AXIS Device Manager to view the system information. The firmware version is displayed on the overview or system page.Affected if The installed version is 11.11.0 or higher but lower than 11.11.94
-
Review user account configurationsNavigate to Settings > Users or the equivalent user management section in the AXIS device web interface. List all configured accounts and their assigned roles.Affected if Operator or viewer accounts exist alongside administrator accounts in the system
-
Audit account permissions and groupsExamine each non-administrator account's assigned privileges, focusing on operator and viewer roles. Check whether any accounts have permissions that appear elevated beyond the standard operator or viewer baseline.Affected if Any operator or viewer account shows permissions inconsistent with the standard role definition, indicating potential unauthorized privilege escalation
-
Inspect system configuration for manipulation indicatorsReview the device configuration files or audit logs for changes related to user permissions, group memberships, or access control settings. Look for recent modifications that may have been made through configuration manipulation.Affected if Recent or unexpected configuration changes involving user privilege settings are present in the audit log
You are affected if your AXIS OS version is 11.11.0 through 11.11.93 and you have operator or viewer accounts whose permissions appear elevated beyond their intended role.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.11.94
Apply the patched AXIS OS version from Axis security advisory and audit existing operator/viewer account configurations for unauthorized privilege escalation.
AXIS OS 11.11.94 or later (2024 LTS track)
- Identify the current AXIS OS version running on the device using the device web interface or AXIS Device Manager
- Access the device administration panel and navigate to Settings > System > Maintenance
- Under the firmware upgrade section, upload and install AXIS OS version 11.11.94 or later
- After upgrade, verify the new version is installed and confirm that operator/viewer accounts no longer have elevated privileges
- Document the upgrade in change management system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6979 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6979 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data