CVE-2024-7006
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA null pointer dereference flaw was found in Libtiff via `tif_dirinfo.c`. This issue may allow an attacker to trigger memory allocation failures through certain means, such as restricting the heap space size or injecting faults, causing a segmentation fault. This can cause an application crash, eventually leading to a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in Libtiff's tif_dirinfo.c component. When memory allocation fails due to constrained heap space or injected faults, the code attempts to dereference a null pointer, causing a segmentation fault that leads to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 9.2= 9.2= 9.2>= 3.5.1, <= 4.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Libtiff is installedOn Linux/Unix systems, run 'ldconfig -p | grep -i tiff' or check for library files in /usr/lib/ or /usr/lib64/ directories (e.g., libtiff.so, libtiff.so.5)Affected if No Libtiff library files are found on the system, meaning the library is not installed
-
Determine the installed Libtiff versionRun 'rpm -q libtiff' (RHEL) or check the library version with 'strings /usr/lib/libtiff.so.X 2>/dev/null | grep -i version' or use 'tiffinfo -version' if availableAffected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not displayed
-
Compare version against affected rangeVerify the installed version falls within >= 3.5.1 and <= 4.6.0. For RHEL, also check if version matches: RHEL 8.0, 9.0, 9.2 for ARM64, Power Little Endian, or Server Aus variantsAffected if The installed version is within 3.5.1 to 4.6.0 inclusive, or matches the listed RHEL versions, indicating the vulnerable code is present
-
Confirm the vulnerable component existsCheck for the presence of tif_dirinfo.c in the Libtiff source or binary installation. Look for tif_dirinfo.o object file or the compiled library containing this component using 'nm libtiff.so | grep dirinfo' or 'strings libtiff.so | grep tif_dirinfo'Affected if The tif_dirinfo component is found in the installed Libtiff library, confirming the vulnerable code path exists
If Libtiff is installed and its version falls within 3.5.1 to 4.6.0 (or matches the specific RHEL versions listed), the system is affected by this null pointer dereference vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched version of Libtiff that includes proper null pointer validation in tif_dirinfo.c, or implement input validation to detect and reject malformed TIFF files before processing.
libtiff version containing the CVE-2024-7006 fix (check RedHat errata RHSA or Debian security advisory DSA for exact version)
- Update the system package cache: sudo dnf check-update (RHEL) or sudo apt update (Debian)
- Install the updated Libtiff package: sudo dnf update libtiff (RHEL) or sudo apt install libtiff4 (Debian)
- Restart any services or applications that use Libtiff to ensure the patched library is loaded
- Verify the fix by checking the installed version: rpm -q libtiff or dpkg -l | grep libtiff
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7006 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data