Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2024-7128

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Several endpoints in the application use the authHandler() and authHandlerWithUser() middleware functions. When the default authentication provider ("openShiftAuth") is set, these functions do not perform any authentication checks, relying instead on the targeted service to handle authentication and authorization. This issue leads to various degrees of data exposure due to a lack of proper credential verification.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The OpenShift console's authHandler() and authHandlerWithUser() middleware functions skip authentication verification when the default 'openShiftAuth' provider is configured, delegating credential checks to downstream services instead. This allows unauthenticated access to affected endpoints, resulting in sensitive data exposure due to the lack of proper credential verification at the middleware layer.

MitigationModify authHandler() and authHandlerWithUser() middleware to enforce authentication checks regardless of the configured authentication provider, ensuring credentials are validated before allowing access to protected endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenShift console deployment
    Check if the OpenShift console is deployed in your environment by running 'oc get routes -n openshift-console' or checking for console-related pods with 'oc get pods -n openshift-console'
    Affected if OpenShift console is not present in the environment
  2. Locate the authentication configuration
    Examine the OpenShift OAuth configuration by running 'oc get oauth cluster -o yaml' and look for the 'providers' section
    Affected if The 'openShiftAuth' provider is configured as the default or primary authentication method
  3. Verify authHandler middleware configuration
    Inspect the console deployment configuration with 'oc get deployment console -n openshift-console -o yaml' and check for environment variables or config maps related to authHandler and authentication providers
    Affected if The middleware is configured to delegate authentication to downstream services when using the default openShiftAuth provider
  4. Test authentication enforcement at middleware layer
    Make an unauthenticated request to a protected console endpoint (e.g., /api/kubernetes/...) and observe whether the request is rejected at the middleware layer or allowed to proceed to downstream services
    Affected if Requests without valid credentials are not rejected by the middleware and reach downstream services for credential validation
  5. Check for exposed sensitive endpoints
    Review console API endpoints that should require authentication and verify whether unauthenticated access returns sensitive data or is properly blocked
    Affected if Unauthenticated requests to protected endpoints return data or succeed instead of returning 401/403 errors

You are affected if the OpenShift console is deployed with the default openShiftAuth provider and the authHandler/authHandlerWithUser middleware is delegating authentication checks to downstream services rather than enforcing them at the middleware layer.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Modify authHandler() and authHandlerWithUser() middleware to enforce authentication checks regardless of the configured authentication provider, ensuring credentials are validated before allowing access to protected endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing20.0 h
  • Review / QA12.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7128 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7128 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data