CVE-2024-7141
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVersions of Gliffy Online prior to versions 4.14.0-7 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceGliffy Online versions prior to 4.14.0-7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user into unknowingly submitting malicious requests to the Gliffy application, potentially performing unauthorized actions such as diagram modifications or account changes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Gliffy Online versionLocate the version information for your Gliffy Online installation. This is typically found in the product about page, admin dashboard, or version endpoint. Consult your product documentation for the exact location.Affected if Your installed version is lower than 4.14.0-7 (e.g., 4.14.0-6, 4.13.x, 4.12.x, etc.)
-
Confirm version comparisonCompare your identified version number against the affected range: versions prior to 4.14.0-7 are vulnerable. Versions 4.14.0-7 and later are not affected.Affected if The version you identified is earlier than 4.14.0-7
You are affected if your Gliffy Online version is lower than 4.14.0-7.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Gliffy Online to version 4.14.0-7 or later which contains the CSRF fix. Until then, consider implementing SameSite cookie attributes and validating Origin/Referer headers as additional defensive measures.
Gliffy Online version 4.14.0-7 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of Gliffy Online installation
- 2. Create a backup of the Gliffy Online data and configuration
- 3. Download Gliffy Online version 4.14.0-7 or a later stable release from the official Perforce portal (portal.perforce.com)
- 4. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure to install the new version
- 5. After upgrade, verify the application is functioning correctly
- 6. Confirm the CSRF vulnerability is resolved by testing the affected endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7141 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7141 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data