CVE-2024-7442
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability was found in Vivotek SD9364 VVTK-0103f. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function getenv of the file upload_file.cgi. The manipulation of the argument QUERY_STRING leads to command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-273527. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. NOTE: Vendor was contacted early and confirmed that the affected release tree is end-of-life.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the getenv function of upload_file.cgi on Vivotek SD9364 VVTK-0103f IP cameras. By manipulating the QUERY_STRING argument, an attacker can inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands remotely. The CVSS 9.8 score reflects the trivial exploitability and complete compromise possible.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the camera modelAccess the camera web interface or use network enumeration to confirm the device is a Vivotek SD9364 VVTK-0103f. Check the system information page or SNMP/ONVIF device info for the exact model number.Affected if The device model is Vivotek SD9364 with any firmware version.
-
Confirm firmware versionNavigate to the camera administration interface and locate the firmware version information, typically found under System > Information or Maintenance > Firmware Upgrade. Alternatively, query the device via ONVIF or manufacturer-specific API endpoints.Affected if Any firmware version is present since all versions are affected per the advisory.
-
Verify upload_file.cgi accessibilityAttempt to access the CGI endpoint via HTTP GET request to /cgi-bin/upload_file.cgi or /cgi-bin/admin/upload_file.cgi on the camera IP address. Check for any response or authentication requirement.Affected if The endpoint responds without requiring authentication, indicating it may be exploitable.
-
Assess network exposureDetermine if the camera management interface is accessible from untrusted networks. Review firewall rules, VLAN placement, and network ACLs to confirm whether the device HTTP/HTTPS ports are reachable from outside the trusted management network.Affected if The camera HTTP/HTTPS ports are reachable from untrusted networks, enabling unauthenticated attackers to inject commands via QUERY_STRING.
The environment is affected if a Vivotek SD9364 camera with any firmware version has its upload_file.cgi endpoint accessible from a network where untrusted actors can send HTTP requests containing arbitrary QUERY_STRING parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedThis is an end-of-life product with no vendor patch available. Immediately remove from production networks. If the device must remain in service, implement strict network segmentation, disable external access, and deploy WAF/IPS rules to block QUERY_STRING manipulation attempts.
- This vulnerability affects Vivotek SD9364 VVTK-0103f firmware which is explicitly end-of-life and no longer supported by the vendor.
- No patch or fixed version is available as the vendor has confirmed the affected release tree is end-of-life.
- The vendor was contacted early and confirmed the product is no longer supported.
- Replace the affected device with a currently supported model from Vivotek or an alternative vendor.
- If immediate replacement is not possible, network segmentation and strict firewall rules may help reduce attack surface, but cannot fully mitigate the command injection vulnerability.
- Consider monitoring for any unauthorized access attempts and potential indicator compromise.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7442 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data