Integer OverflowWeakness · CWE-190

CVE-2024-7488

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Integer Overflow or Wraparound, Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in RestApp Inc. Online Ordering System allows Integer Attacks. This issue affects Online Ordering System: 8.2.1. NOTE: Vulnerability fixed in version 8.2.2 and does not exist before 8.2.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Integer overflow vulnerability in RestApp Online Ordering System version 8.2.1 allows manipulation of quantity input fields to trigger integer wraparound, potentially enabling attackers to specify invalid quantities through integer attacks.

MitigationUpgrade to version 8.2.2 where the vulnerability is fixed, and implement strict input validation for all quantity fields to prevent integer overflow or wraparound conditions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of RestApp Online Ordering System
    Locate the version information for your RestApp installation. This is typically found in the application metadata, about page, or system information panel within the admin interface. If you have command-line access, use the system's package manager or version command if applicable.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.2.1 exactly, as this is the only version explicitly listed as affected in the CVE summary.
  2. Confirm the online ordering module is active
    Access the RestApp admin panel and verify whether the Online Ordering System feature or module is enabled. Check the module or feature list in the administration settings.
    Affected if The online ordering module is enabled and accessible to end users, as the vulnerability exists within this functionality.
  3. Locate quantity input fields in the ordering system
    Navigate to the ordering interface (the customer-facing order form) and identify all input fields that accept quantity values for products or items. Document which forms or pages contain these fields.
    Affected if Quantity input fields exist and accept user-supplied values without sufficient validation.
  4. Inspect quantity field validation logic
    Examine the server-side or client-side code that processes quantity input values. Focus on how the application handles, stores, or calculates with these values. Look for integer type handling and arithmetic operations on quantity data.
    Affected if The application does not enforce strict bounds checking or proper integer handling on quantity inputs, allowing values that could trigger wraparound.

You are affected if your RestApp Online Ordering System is version 8.2.1, has the online ordering module enabled, and contains quantity input fields that lack proper integer overflow protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to version 8.2.2 where the vulnerability is fixed, and implement strict input validation for all quantity fields to prevent integer overflow or wraparound conditions.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

8.2.2

  1. 1. Identify the RestApp Inc. Online Ordering System instance in your environment
  2. 2. Verify the current running version is 8.2.1
  3. 3. Obtain version 8.2.2 from the official vendor (RestApp Inc.)
  4. 4. Apply the upgrade following vendor-provided upgrade procedures
  5. 5. Verify the system is running version 8.2.2 after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,340
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7488 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data