NavisworksApplication · Autodesk

CVE-2024-7670

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed in w3dtk.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A maliciously crafted DWFX file parsed through w3dtk.dll in Autodesk Navisworks triggers an out-of-bounds read vulnerability, allowing an attacker to cause denial of service, read sensitive memory contents, or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.

MitigationAvoid opening untrusted or unverified DWFX files in Navisworks; apply vendor-supplied security patches promptly once available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NavisworksApplication
Affected:= 2025= 2025.1= 2025.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Navisworks installation
    Check for Navisworks installation by searching for 'Autodesk Navisworks' in installed programs or looking for Navisworks executable (navisworks.exe) in typical installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Navisworks Manage 2025\ or C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Navisworks Simulate 2025\
    Affected if Navisworks 2025 series is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed Navisworks version
    Open Navisworks and go to Help > About Navisworks, or right-click the navisworks.exe file, select Properties, and check the File Version field. Alternatively, check the Windows Registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Autodesk\Navisworks for the InstallVersion value
    Affected if Version displayed is 2025, 2025.1, or 2025.2 (exactly matching these versions)
  3. Confirm vulnerable component exists
    Locate the file w3dtk.dll in the Navisworks installation directory, typically found in C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Navisworks Manage 2025\ or C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Navisworks Simulate 2025\
    Affected if w3dtk.dll exists in the Navisworks 2025 installation folder
  4. Check DWFX file handling capability
    Verify that Navisworks can open DWFX files by checking file associations (look for .dwfx extension handler) or attempt to open a DWFX file through Navisworks. Also check for presence of dwfx reader modules in the installation directory
    Affected if DWFX file support is available or .dwfx files can be opened in Navisworks

You are affected if Navisworks version 2025, 2025.1, or 2025.2 is installed with w3dtk.dll present and DWFX file handling capability exists, as opening a malicious DWFX file could trigger the out-of-bounds read in the parsing library.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid opening untrusted or unverified DWFX files in Navisworks; apply vendor-supplied security patches promptly once available.

Fix this in Navisworks Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7670 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7670 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data