Out-of-bounds WriteWeakness · CWE-787

CVE-2024-7695

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple switches are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. This vulnerability is caused by insufficient input validation, which allows data to be written to memory outside the bounds of the buffer. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in a denial-of-service attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in network switch firmware caused by insufficient input validation. The flaw allows an attacker to write data beyond allocated buffer boundaries, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation results in denial of service, and the high CVSS score (7.5) reflects the serious impact of memory corruption vulnerabilities.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or firmware updates for affected switches once available. In the interim, restrict network access to switch management interfaces and implement strict input validation at network boundaries to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the network switch device and firmware version
    Access the switch CLI or web interface and retrieve the firmware version information using commands such as 'show version' or by checking the system information page
    Affected if The device is a network switch and the installed firmware version matches or falls within any vendor-announced affected version ranges for CVE-2024-7695
  2. Confirm management interface accessibility
    Verify whether the switch management interface (web GUI, CLI over SSH/Telnet, or SNMP) is reachable from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, ACLs, or interface configurations
    Affected if The management interface is exposed to untrusted networks without proper access controls, as the vulnerability can be exploited remotely via network input
  3. Review input validation configuration
    Inspect the switch configuration for any input validation settings, ACLs applied to management ports, or traffic filtering rules that control what network traffic reaches the switch
    Affected if The switch lacks input validation controls or has permissive rules allowing arbitrary network traffic to reach management interfaces
  4. Check for vendor advisory
    Search vendor security advisories or the CVE database for any published affected version list, firmware patch status, or remediation guidance specific to this CVE
    Affected if The vendor has published an advisory indicating that this switch model and firmware version are affected by CVE-2024-7695

A defender is affected if they are running a network switch with firmware version that matches vendor-specified affected versions for CVE-2024-7695 AND the switch management interface is accessible from network paths where an attacker could send malicious input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or firmware updates for affected switches once available. In the interim, restrict network access to switch management interfaces and implement strict input validation at network boundaries to reduce attack surface.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7695 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data