CVE-2024-7715
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20240812. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function sprintf of the file /cgi-bin/photocenter_mgr.cgi. The manipulation of the argument filter leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. NOTE: Vendor was contacted early and confirmed that the product is end-of-life. It should be retired and replaced.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in D-Link NAS devices (multiple models including DNS-320, DNS-325, DNS-327L, etc.) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the 'filter' parameter in /cgi-bin/photocenter_mgr.cgi. The sprintf function uses unsanitized user input, enabling shell command injection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify D-Link NAS modelCheck the device label, admin web interface footer, or system info page for the exact model number (e.g., DNS-320, DNS-325, DNS-327L)Affected if Model matches DNS-320, DNS-325, DNS-327L, or other related D-Link NAS models from the same era
-
Verify photocenter_mgr.cgi existsAttempt to access http://<device-ip>/cgi-bin/photocenter_mgr.cgi via HTTP request or check file system if SSH/telnet access is availableAffected if The CGI script is present and responds to requests (indicates the photo center feature is installed)
-
Check firmware versionIn the device web UI, navigate to System > Firmware Upgrade or System > Status to view the installed firmware version numberAffected if Firmware version is any version on these legacy D-Link NAS devices (the vulnerability exists in the shipped code)
-
Assess network exposureCheck router/firewall rules to determine if the device's web interface (ports 80/443) is accessible from the internet or untrusted networksAffected if The device admin interface is exposed directly to the internet or to untrusted guest networks
The environment is affected if it runs a D-Link DNS-320, DNS-325, DNS-327L or similar NAS model with the photocenter_mgr.cgi accessible and the device is network-accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedProducts are end-of-life and unsupported; D-Link advises retirement and replacement. Immediately disconnect affected devices from the internet and segregate on internal networks if continued use is required. There will be no vendor patch.
- These D-Link products (DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05, DNS-1550-04) are end-of-life and no longer supported by the vendor.
- The official description explicitly states the products should be retired and replaced.
- If these devices must remain in operation, isolate them on a restricted network segment with firewall rules limiting access to trusted IP addresses only.
- Consider migrating data and services to actively maintained storage solutions from vendors that provide security updates.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7715 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7715 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data