Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2024-8099

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-03-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
92/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an SSRF vulnerability in vanna-ai/vanna where DuckDB's built-in file reading functions (`read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, `read_blob`) can be leveraged through SQL queries to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources. An attacker can abuse these default DuckDB features to bypass network boundaries and access sensitive services or data.

MitigationDisable or restrict DuckDB's file reading and HTTP request functions (`read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, `read_blob`) when using vanna with untrusted input, and implement strict input validation on all SQL queries before execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify vanna installation and version
    Run 'pip show vanna' or check your project's dependency file (requirements.txt, pyproject.toml) for the installed vanna version
    Affected if The installed version is any version of vanna that supports DuckDB backend prior to being patched
  2. Confirm DuckDB is the active database backend
    Inspect your vanna configuration or initialization code to verify DuckDB is being used as the SQL database (check for 'duckdb' in connection strings or backend settings)
    Affected if DuckDB is configured as the SQL backend for vanna
  3. Verify DuckDB network functions are available
    Execute a test SQL query through vanna using: SELECT * FROM read_csv('http://example.com/test.csv') to see if HTTP requests can be initiated from the database
    Affected if The query executes successfully and attempts an HTTP request, indicating the functions are not blocked
  4. Check for SQL input validation layer
    Review your application code that passes queries to vanna's SQL execution layer to see if any input validation, sanitization, or query allow-listing is implemented before queries reach DuckDB
    Affected if No input validation exists and arbitrary SQL can be passed directly to DuckDB through vanna
  5. Inspect DuckDB configuration for network restrictions
    Check if DuckDB is configured with disabled network access (duckdb_config with httpfs disabled or network access settings restricted) by querying DuckDB's settings
    Affected if Network access is not explicitly disabled in DuckDB configuration

You are affected if you use vanna with DuckDB as the SQL backend and the read_csv/read_csv_auto/read_text/read_blob functions can execute HTTP requests without validation or restrictions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable or restrict DuckDB's file reading and HTTP request functions (`read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, `read_blob`) when using vanna with untrusted input, and implement strict input validation on all SQL queries before execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8099 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8099 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data