CVE-2024-8256
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Teltonika Networks RUTOS devices, running on versions 7.0 to 7.8 (excluding) and TSWOS devices running on versions 1.0 to 1.3 (excluding), due to incorrect permission handling a vulnerability exists which allows a lower privileged user with default permissions to access critical device resources via the API.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDue to incorrect permission handling in the API of Teltonika Networks RUTOS (versions 7.0 to 7.8) and TSWOS (versions 1.0 to 1.3) devices, a lower privileged user with default permissions can bypass authorization checks and access critical device resources that should be restricted to higher-privilege accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the device's web administration interface or use the command line (e.g., '固件版本' or 'cat /etc/version') to determine the exact firmware version installedAffected if The firmware version is RUTOS 7.0 through 7.8 or TSWOS 1.0 through 1.3
-
Verify API service is accessibleCheck if the device's web API endpoint is reachable (typically on HTTP/HTTPS ports 80/443 or a specific API path such as /api or /cgi-bin/api)Affected if The API is exposed and responds to requests without requiring elevated privileges
-
Confirm presence of low-privilege user accountsReview user accounts in the device's user management section (usually under System > Administration or similar) to identify accounts with limited/default permissionsAffected if There exists at least one user account with lower privileges than administrator present on the device
-
Test for authorization bypassUsing a low-privilege account, attempt to access API endpoints that should require higher privileges (such as sensitive configuration endpoints, system status, or administrative functions)Affected if A lower-privileged user can successfully access resources or functions restricted to administrator or higher-privilege accounts
The device is affected if it runs RUTOS firmware version 7.0-7.8 or TSWOS version 1.0-1.3, has the API accessible, and a low-privilege user can access higher-privilege resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate RUTOS to version 7.8 or later and TSWOS to version 1.3 or later to obtain the patched firmware. In the interim, restrict API access to trusted networks and monitor for anomalous API requests indicating unauthorized resource access.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8256 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data