KroxyliciousApplication · Redhat

CVE-2024-8285

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
65/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in Kroxylicious. When establishing the connection with the upstream Kafka server using a TLS secured connection, Kroxylicious fails to properly verify the server's hostname, resulting in an insecure connection. For a successful attack to be performed, the attacker needs to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack or compromise any external systems, such as DNS or network routing configuration. This issue is considered a high complexity attack, with additional high privileges required, as the attack would need access to the Kroxylicious configuration or a peer system. The result of a successful attack impacts both data integrity and confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Kroxylicious fails to properly verify the hostname when establishing TLS connections to upstream Kafka servers, allowing an attacker with MITM capabilities to intercept traffic by presenting a valid certificate for a different hostname. This breaks the trust chain in TLS and enables data interception.

MitigationEnable and enforce proper TLS hostname verification in Kroxylicious configuration for upstream Kafka connections to ensure certificates match the target broker's hostname.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
KroxyliciousApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Kroxylicious configuration file
    Find the YAML configuration file (commonly kroxylicious.yaml or specified via KROXYLICIOUS_CONFIG_FILE environment variable) used by your deployment
    Affected if Configuration file cannot be located or does not exist - unable to verify TLS settings
  2. Identify upstream Kafka TLS configuration
    In the configuration file, look for the upstream Kafka broker definition under the clusters or upstream section, and check for tls or ssl settings
    Affected if No TLS/SSL configuration is present for upstream connections - vulnerability does not apply
  3. Check for hostname verification setting
    Within the TLS configuration section for the upstream connection, look for a hostnameVerification, endpointIdentification, or similar hostname verification parameter
    Affected if Hostname verification is explicitly disabled, set to DISABLED, or absent from the TLS configuration - the vulnerability applies
  4. Verify verification is enforced
    Confirm the hostname verification setting is set to a value that enforces verification (such as ENABLED, true, or a strict policy), not disabled or omitted
    Affected if Hostname verification is not explicitly set to an enforced state - the vulnerability applies

Your environment is affected if upstream Kafka connections use TLS but hostname verification is not explicitly enabled or enforced in the Kroxylicious configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Enable and enforce proper TLS hostname verification in Kroxylicious configuration for upstream Kafka connections to ensure certificates match the target broker's hostname.

Fix this in Kroxylicious Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8285 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data