CVE-2024-8306
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCWE-269: Improper Privilege Management vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access, loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability of the workstation when non-admin authenticated user tries to perform privilege escalation by tampering with the binaries.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability (CWE-269) where a non-admin authenticated user can tamper with binaries to gain elevated privileges. The improper privilege management allows tampering with system binaries, bypassing proper authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.3= 6.3all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Schneider Electric Vijeo Designer is installedCheck for Vijeo Designer installation by searching Program Files directories or using system inventory tools for 'Vijeo Designer' applicationAffected if The application is found installed on the system
-
Determine the installed version of Vijeo DesignerCheck the installed version through the application itself, Windows Programs and Features, or by examining version information in the installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 6.3 or any version below 6.3 (versions < 6.3)
-
Confirm if Vijeo Designer Embedded in Ecostruxure Machine Expert is presentSearch for Ecostruxure Machine Expert installation which may include Vijeo Designer Embedded componentAffected if Vijeo Designer Embedded is present (all versions of this component are affected)
-
Identify Vijeo Designer binaries and servicesLocate the main executable and any associated services in the installation directory (typically under Schneider Electric or similar program folders)Affected if Binaries are present and accessible to non-admin users
-
Check file permissions on Vijeo Designer binariesUse icacls or similar tools to inspect Access Control Lists (ACLs) on identified binary files and directoriesAffected if Non-admin authenticated users have write or modify permissions on system binaries, allowing tampering
You are affected if Vijeo Designer (version 6.3 or below) or Vijeo Designer Embedded is installed and non-admin users can modify the application binaries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.3
Implement strict file permissions on system binaries to prevent unauthorized modification, add binary integrity verification (e.g., code signing validation), and enforce proper privilege checks before executing privileged operations.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8306 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data