CVE-2024-8329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited6SHR system from Gether Technology does not properly validate the specific page parameter, allowing remote attackers with regular privilege to inject SQL command to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Gether Technology's 6SHR system allows authenticated users with regular privileges to inject malicious SQL commands through an unvalidated 'page' parameter. Successful exploitation enables unauthorized read, modification, or deletion of database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm 6SHR system deploymentSearch your application inventory, deployed web applications list, or server directory for files/components related to '6SHR' or '6shr System' from Gether TechnologyAffected if The 6SHR system is present in your environment
-
Identify the page parameter endpointLocate web application endpoints that accept a 'page' parameter (common in pagination or page navigation functionality). Review application URL patterns, source code, or proxy logs for requests containing 'page=' query parametersAffected if The application exposes an endpoint accepting a 'page' parameter
-
Verify authentication requirementsTest whether the 'page' parameter endpoint requires authentication, and if so, what privilege level is needed to access it. Check if regular (non-admin) users can reach this functionalityAffected if Regular authenticated users can access the page parameter endpoint without elevated privileges
-
Check input validation on page parameterInspect application code, web application firewall (WAF) rules, or intercept HTTP requests to determine if the 'page' parameter is validated, sanitized, or passed through parameterized queries versus concatenated directly into SQL queriesAffected if No input validation, sanitization, or parameterized queries are implemented for the 'page' parameter
If the 6SHR system is deployed and the 'page' parameter endpoint is accessible to regular authenticated users without proper input validation, the environment is affected by CVE-2024-8329.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the page parameter. Apply vendor-supplied patches when available.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data