CVE-2024-8359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVisteon Infotainment REFLASH_DDU_FindFile Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Visteon Infotainment systems. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the REFLASH_DDU_FindFile function. A crafted software update file can trigger execution of a system call composed from a user-supplied string. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-23420.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a command injection vulnerability in Visteon Infotainment systems specifically within the REFLASH_DDU_FindFile function. Attackers with physical access can craft malicious software update files containing user-supplied strings that get executed via system calls, achieving arbitrary code execution in the device context without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= cmu150_na_74.00.324aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Visteon Infotainment system versionAccess the device settings or system information menu on the infotainment unit, or inspect the firmware metadata if you have access to the device firmware image. Look for the version string which typically appears as cmu150_na_XX.XX.XXXAffected if The displayed version is exactly cmu150_na_74.00.324a
-
Locate the firmware version string programmaticallyIf you have shell access or can extract the firmware, search for the version string in the firmware binary or system files. Common locations include /etc/version, /var/log/messages during boot, or within the bootloader configurationAffected if The version string matches cmu150_na_74.00.324a exactly
-
Verify the REFLASH_DDU_FindFile function existsIf you can analyze the firmware binary, search for the string REFLASH_DDU_FindFile or inspect the firmware update mechanism code for the presence of this function handling file operations in the update processAffected if The function REFLASH_DDU_FindFile is present in the firmware and processes user-supplied strings from update files
-
Check if software update functionality is exposedExamine whether the device exposes USB or SD card-based software update ports, or if the REFLASH mechanism can be triggered without authentication. This may require physical access to the device debug ports or update interfacesAffected if The device allows unsigned or unvalidated software update files to be loaded via physical access
You are affected if your Visteon Infotainment system runs exactly version cmu150_na_74.00.324a and supports the software update mechanism where the REFLASH_DDU_FindFile function processes update files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince this is a firmware-level command injection in the update mechanism, remediation requires a vendor-supplied patch with secure input validation in the REFLASH_DDU_FindFile function, along with cryptographic signing of update files to prevent tampering. Physical access controls should also be considered as a compensating control.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data