CVE-2024-8404
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn arbitrary file deletion vulnerability exists in PaperCut NG/MF, specifically affecting Windows servers with Web Print enabled. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must first obtain local login access to the Windows Server hosting PaperCut NG/MF and be capable of executing low-privilege code directly on the server via the web-print-hot-folder. Important: In most installations, this risk is mitigated by the default Windows Server configuration, which restricts local login access to Administrators only. However, this vulnerability could pose a risk to customers who allow non-administrative users to log into the local console of the Windows environment hosting the PaperCut NG/MF application server. Update: This CVE has been updated in May 2025 to update the fixed version and fix process. Please refer to the May 2025 Security Bulletin. Note: This CVE has been split from CVE-2024-3037.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2024-8404 is an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in PaperCut NG/MF affecting Windows servers with Web Print enabled. Attackers with local login access and the ability to execute low-privilege code through the web-print-hot-folder can delete arbitrary files on the system, potentially leading to denial of service or privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 23.0.9< 23.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PaperCut versionLocate the PaperCut installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\PaperCut MF or PaperCut NG) and check the version. You can also view the version from the PaperCut admin console or check the installer log files.Affected if The installed version is lower than 23.0.9 (e.g., 23.0.8, 22.x, 21.x, etc.)
-
Confirm product is NG or MFCheck if the installed product is PaperCut NG or PaperCut MF. Both are affected by this vulnerability.Affected if The product is either PaperCut NG or PaperCut MF with version < 23.0.9
-
Verify Web Print hot-folder is enabledAccess the PaperCut admin console, navigate to the Web Print / Print Release section, and check if the hot-folder feature is configured and enabled. The vulnerability specifically targets the web-print-hot-folder functionality.Affected if Web Print hot-folder feature is enabled and accessible to users with local login access
-
Check local console login accessibilityReview Windows Local Security Policy or Group Policy settings to determine which user accounts have logon access to the PaperCut server console. The vulnerability requires attackers to have local login access.Affected if Non-administrator users have local console login access to the PaperCut server
Your environment is affected if you are running PaperCut NG or MF version lower than 23.0.9 on Windows with Web Print hot-folder enabled and non-administrator users have local console login access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.0.9
Restrict local console login to Administrator accounts only via Windows Local Security Policy or Group Policy, and apply the May 2025 security update to obtain the fixed version.
PaperCut NG/MF version 23.0.9 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of PaperCut NG or MF installed on the Windows server
- 2. Backup the PaperCut application data and configuration
- 3. Download the latest version of PaperCut NG/MF (version 23.0.9 or later) from the official PaperCut website
- 4. Run the installer and follow the upgrade prompts to update the installation
- 5. After upgrade, verify that Web Print functionality is working correctly
- 6. Confirm the new version by checking About or the administration interface
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8404 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8404 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data