CVE-2024-8458
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain switch models from PLANET Technology have a web application that is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a user into visiting a malicious website, allowing the attacker to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf, such as creating accounts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in the web application of PLANET Technology switches allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended state-changing actions such as creating new administrative accounts by embedding malicious requests in external websites.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.305b240802< 2.305b240719CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the switch modelAccess the device web interface or use SNMP/LDAP queries to determine the exact model number (Planet Gs 4210 24p2s or Planet Gs 4210 24pl4c)Affected if The device is a Planet Gs 4210 24p2s or 24pl4c model
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the web interface and navigate to the System Information or Firmware Upgrade page to view the current firmware version, or use the CLI command 'show version' if availableAffected if Firmware version is below 3.305b240802 for the 24p2s model, or below 2.305b240719 for the 24pl4c model
-
Verify the web application is accessibleAttempt to access the device web management interface over HTTP/HTTPSAffected if The web interface is reachable and responds to authentication requests
-
Determine if state-changing operations lack CSRF protectionsInspect HTML forms or AJAX requests in the web interface for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens (such as hidden form fields named 'csrf_token', 'token', or similar) when performing actions like creating users or changing settingsAffected if State-changing forms (user creation, configuration changes) do not contain anti-CSRF tokens or do not validate Origin/Referer headers
You are affected if you are running a Planet Gs 4210 24p2s or 24pl4c switch with firmware below the specified thresholds and the web interface lacks anti-CSRF protections on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.305b2407193.305b240802
Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations (forms, AJAX calls) and validate the Origin/Referer headers; alternatively, apply vendor-supplied firmware updates if available.
Gs 4210 24p2s: firmware 3.305b240802 or later; Gs 4210 24pl4c: firmware 2.305b240719 or later
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the PLANET switch (Gs 4210 24p2s or Gs 4210 24pl4c)
- 2. Access the device web interface and navigate to the Firmware Upgrade or System Maintenance section
- 3. Check the current firmware version to confirm it is vulnerable (less than 3.305b240802 for 24p2s, or less than 2.305b240719 for 24pl4c)
- 4. Download the fixed firmware version from the official PLANET Technology website or support portal
- 5. Upload the firmware file through the web interface or appropriate update mechanism
- 6. Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete (do not power off the device)
- 7. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed and the CSRF vulnerability is resolved
- 8. Consider implementing anti-CSRF tokens in custom applications if applicable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8458 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8458 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data