CVE-2024-8780
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOMFLOW from The SYSCOM Group does not properly restrict the query range of its data query functionality, allowing remote attackers with regular privileges to obtain accounts and password hashes of other users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOMFLOW's data query functionality lacks proper scoping/authorization checks, allowing authenticated users with standard privileges to access sensitive data (accounts and password hashes) belonging to other users through the query interface. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability enabling unauthorized data disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OMFLOW versionLocate the OMFLOW application version number in the system settings, about page, or application metadata (typically found in the administration panel, installation directory, or HTTP response headers when accessing the application)Affected if The installed version is 1.2.1.3 or any earlier version
-
Confirm data query functionality is accessibleVerify that the OMFLOW web interface includes a data query or search feature that allows authenticated users to submit queries against the system databaseAffected if The data query interface is present and accessible to standard authenticated users
-
Verify sensitive data storage existsCheck if the system stores user account credentials and password hashes in its database (typically in user/account tables)Affected if The application database contains user account records with password hashes
-
Test query parameter isolationSubmit data queries using different authenticated user accounts and examine whether query parameters (such as user ID, account ID, or record identifiers) can be manipulated to access data belonging to other usersAffected if Query parameters are not validated to ensure the requesting user has authorization to access the requested data objects
-
Review authorization configurationExamine the data query module configuration or source code for object-level authorization checks that enforce tenant/user data isolationAffected if No proper authorization scoping is implemented to restrict users from accessing data outside their authorized scope
A user is affected if they run Syscomgo Omflow version 1.2.1.3 or earlier AND the data query functionality is accessible to authenticated users without proper object-level authorization controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper object-level authorization checks in the data query functionality to ensure users can only access data they are authorized to view. Review and restrict query parameters to enforce tenant/user data isolation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8780 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8780 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data