CVE-2024-8805
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBlueZ HID over GATT Profile Improper Access Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of BlueZ. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the HID over GATT Profile. The issue results from the lack of authorization prior to allowing access to functionality. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25177.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBlueZ's HID over GATT Profile implementation lacks proper authorization checks before allowing access to sensitive functionality, allowing unauthenticated network-adjacent attackers within Bluetooth range to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. This is a critical access control failure in the Bluetooth stack used by Linux systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.77CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed BlueZ versionRun 'bluetoothd --version' or 'apt-cache policy bluez' to determine the installed version of the BlueZ Bluetooth stackAffected if The installed version equals 5.77 exactly, as this is the only affected version listed
-
Verify Bluetooth service is activeRun 'systemctl status bluetooth' to confirm the Bluetooth daemon is runningAffected if Bluetooth service is active and running, enabling the vulnerable HID over GATT Profile to be accessible
-
Confirm HID over GATT Profile is configuredRun 'bluetoothctl list' or inspect /etc/bluetooth/ directory for configuration files that enable HID GATT services. Check for any registered HID or GATT profiles with 'bluetoothctl info' on paired devicesAffected if HID over GATT Profile is enabled or any HID GATT service is registered and advertised by the BlueZ instance
-
Check Bluetooth accessibilityUse 'hciconfig' to verify Bluetooth adapters are up and in discoverable/connectable state. Confirm the device is within Bluetooth range of potential attackersAffected if Bluetooth adapters are powered on and set to connectable mode, allowing unauthenticated adjacent attackers to reach the vulnerable service
A user is affected if BlueZ version 5.77 is installed AND the Bluetooth service is running with HID over GATT Profile enabled and accessible to adjacent attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate BlueZ to the latest patched version addressing this vulnerability; if immediate patching is not feasible, restrict Bluetooth exposure by disabling unused Bluetooth adapters and limiting device pairing to trusted devices only.
Latest stable BlueZ release (newer than 5.77)
- Check the current installed BlueZ version using: dpkg -l | grep bluez or rpm -qa | grep bluez
- Update the package repository and upgrade BlueZ to the latest available version using the system's package manager (e.g., apt update && apt install --only-upgrade bluez or dnf update bluez)
- Alternatively, download and install the latest BlueZ source from the official BlueZ repository at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/bluez.git
- After upgrading, verify the new version is installed: bluetoothd --version
- Ensure the Bluetooth service is restarted: systemctl restart bluetooth
- Confirm the system is running a version newer than 5.77
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8805 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8805 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data