Pdf ToolsApplication · Pdf Xchange

CVE-2024-8830

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PDF-XChange Editor XPS File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PDF-XChange Editor. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of XPS files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-24315.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in PDF-XChange Editor's XPS file parser. The application fails to properly validate user-supplied data during XPS parsing, allowing an attacker to write past the end of an allocated buffer. Successful exploitation enables remote code execution in the context of the current user process.

MitigationUsers should avoid opening XPS files from untrusted sources and only open files from trusted origins. Organizations should update PDF-XChange Editor to the latest patched version once available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pdf ToolsApplication
Affected:= 10.3.0.386
Pdf Xchange EditorApplication
Affected:= 10.3.0.386

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if PDF-XChange Editor is installed
    Look for the application in Program Files (typically C:\Program Files\PDF-XChange\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF-XChange\) or check Add/Remove Programs in Windows Control Panel
    Affected if PDF-XChange Editor version 10.3.0.386 is installed
  2. Determine the installed version of PDF-XChange Editor
    Right-click the executable (PDFXEdit.exe), select Properties, and check the File Version on the Details tab. Alternatively, open the application, go to Help > About to view the version
    Affected if The version shown is exactly 10.3.0.386
  3. Check for PDF-XChange Pdf Tools installation
    Look for PDF-XChange Pdf Tools in Program Files or check Add/Remove Programs. The tool may be installed as a separate component or part of the Editor package
    Affected if PDF-XChange Pdf Tools version 10.3.0.386 is installed
  4. Verify XPS file handling capability
    Attempt to open a benign XPS file in PDF-XChange Editor to confirm the XPS parser module is present and functional
    Affected if The application can open XPS files, indicating the vulnerable parser component is enabled

You are affected if you have version 10.3.0.386 of either PDF-XChange Editor or PDF-XChange Pdf Tools installed and use the application to open XPS files from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should avoid opening XPS files from untrusted sources and only open files from trusted origins. Organizations should update PDF-XChange Editor to the latest patched version once available.

Fix this in Pdf Tools Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8830 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8830 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data