CVE-2024-8883
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA misconfiguration flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue can allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary URL if a 'Valid Redirect URI' is set to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1, enabling sensitive information such as authorization codes to be exposed to the attacker, potentially leading to session hijacking.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKeycloak contains a misconfiguration where Valid Redirect URIs are set to generic http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1 patterns instead of specific absolute URLs. This allows an attacker to craft malicious links using these allowed prefixes to redirect users to arbitrary external sites after authentication, potentially intercepting authorization codes during the OAuth flow and enabling session hijacking.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 4.11= 4.12= 4.9= 4.10= 4.9= 4.10= 4.9= 4.10all versions= 7.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Keycloak versionAccess the Keycloak admin console or use the REST API endpoint /admin/realms/{realm} to retrieve server info. Check the 'version' field in the response.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected product ranges listed in the CVE (all versions of Redhat Build of Keycloak, Redhat Single Sign On, or specific versions of Redhat Openshift Container Platform).
-
List all client configurationsUse the Keycloak Admin API: GET /admin/realms/{realm}/clients or navigate to the 'Clients' section in the admin console. Retrieve the 'redirectUris' array for each client.Affected if Any client has a redirect URI that begins with http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1 (with or without port numbers) rather than a specific absolute HTTPS URL.
-
Inspect Web Origins configurationFor each client, check the 'webOrigins' field in the client configuration. Navigate to Client Settings > Advanced Settings > Web Origins in the admin console.Affected if Web Origins is set to '*' (wildcard) or includes origins that could allow CORS-based token leakage in conjunction with the vulnerable redirect URIs.
You are affected if your Keycloak version matches the affected product ranges AND any client has redirect URIs configured with generic http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1 patterns instead of specific absolute HTTPS URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate all Keycloak client configurations to use specific, absolute HTTPS redirect URIs rather than generic localhost/127.0.0.1 patterns, and properly constrain the 'Web Origins' setting to prevent CORS-based token leakage.
- 1. Access the Keycloak Admin Console and navigate to the Realm Settings > Login Settings section.
- 2. Review all clients and identify any 'Valid Redirect URI' or 'Base URL' settings that are configured to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1.
- 3. For each affected client, update the 'Valid Redirect URI' to use a specific, fully qualified domain name (e.g., https://your-domain.com/*) instead of localhost or 127.0.0.1.
- 4. Ensure the redirect URIs follow the principle of least privilege - only allow specific, expected redirect URLs rather than wildcard patterns if possible.
- 5. After making changes, test the authentication flow to verify redirects work correctly for legitimate users.
- 6. Document the corrected redirect URI configuration in client documentation to prevent regression.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-8883 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- github.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-8883 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data