Deserialization of Untrusted DataWeakness · CWE-502

CVE-2024-9070

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-03-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A deserialization vulnerability exists in BentoML's runner server in bentoml/bentoml versions <=1.3.4.post1. By setting specific parameters, an attacker can execute unauthorized arbitrary code on the server, causing severe harm. The vulnerability is triggered when the args-number parameter is greater than 1, leading to automatic deserialization and arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A deserialization vulnerability exists in BentoML's runner server where setting the args-number parameter to a value greater than 1 triggers automatic deserialization of untrusted data, enabling arbitrary code execution on the affected server.

MitigationUpgrade BentoML to a version beyond 1.3.4.post1 once available, and as an interim control, implement input validation to restrict or sanitize the args-number parameter before deployment of the fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify BentoML installation
    Run 'pip show bentoml' or 'pip list | grep -i bentoml' to check if BentoML is installed
    Affected if BentoML is not installed on the system
  2. Check installed BentoML version
    Run 'pip show bentoml' and note the Version field, then compare to the affected range (all versions up to and including 1.3.4.post1)
    Affected if The installed version is 1.3.4.post1 or earlier
  3. Locate BentoML runner configuration
    Search project directories for bentoml.yml, bentomodel.yaml, or Python files that initialize runners using Runner() or bentoml.run()
    Affected if No runner configuration files exist (not using runners)
  4. Inspect args-number parameter usage
    Grep for 'args-number' or 'args_number' in configuration files and Python source code; also check any environment variables or deployment manifests
    Affected if args-number is explicitly set to a value greater than 1, or defaults to a value greater than 1 in the runner configuration

The environment is affected if BentoML version 1.3.4.post1 or earlier is installed AND the runner server is used with args-number parameter set to any value greater than 1, enabling unsafe deserialization of input data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade BentoML to a version beyond 1.3.4.post1 once available, and as an interim control, implement input validation to restrict or sanitize the args-number parameter before deployment of the fix.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest stable BentoML release (version >1.3.4.post1)

  1. 1. Identify the current BentoML version installed by running: pip show bentoml or bentoml --version
  2. 2. If the installed version is <=1.3.4.post1, upgrade to the latest stable BentoML release using: pip install --upgrade bentoml
  3. 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version with: pip show bentoml
  4. 4. Test that critical BentoML functionality works as expected after the upgrade
  5. 5. Review the BentoML release notes for the version you upgraded to for any additional security-related changes
Caveat Review release notes for your target version as there may be API changes or configuration updates between major versions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
23.0 hours of engineering $4,080
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,528.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9070 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9070 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data