OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2024-9139

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The affected product permits OS command injection through improperly restricted commands, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OS command injection vulnerability where the application allows execution of shell commands through improperly restricted input paths. Attackers can inject malicious commands via user-controlled parameters that reach system command execution functions, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution with the application's privileges.

MitigationImplement strict input validation using allowlists, replace dynamic command construction with parameterized APIs or library functions, and enforce principle of least privilege on the application service account.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the application and version
    Inventory the software running in your environment and record its exact version number. Check installation directories, package managers, or configuration files for version information.
    Affected if The application version cannot be determined or is unknown, preventing comparison to any affected version ranges.
  2. Locate command execution functions in the codebase
    Search the application source code or binary for dangerous functions that execute system commands, such as exec(), system(), popen(), Runtime.exec(), ProcessBuilder, or shell invocation APIs. Review any custom wrappers around these functions.
    Affected if The application contains code that invokes system commands and the source of those commands includes parameters that originate from user input.
  3. Trace user input to command execution paths
    Analyze the data flow from user-supplied parameters (HTTP request parameters, form inputs, API arguments, file paths, headers) through the application to identify if and how they reach the command execution functions found in the previous step.
    Affected if User-controlled parameters are passed directly or with minimal transformation to command execution functions without sanitization.
  4. Inspect input validation logic
    Review any input validation, sanitization, or filtering code that processes parameters before they reach command execution functions. Look for allowlists, blacklists, or escaping mechanisms.
    Affected if No input validation exists, or validation relies on blocklists or incomplete sanitization that could be bypassed.
  5. Review application deployment and privileges
    Check the service account or process identity under which the application runs. Identify what system resources, files, and network capabilities the application can access.
    Affected if The application runs with elevated privileges or broad file system access, increasing the potential impact of command injection.

Your environment is affected if the application uses system command execution functions and user-supplied input can reach those functions without proper validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation using allowlists, replace dynamic command construction with parameterized APIs or library functions, and enforce principle of least privilege on the application service account.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9139 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data