CVE-2024-9194
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Octopus Server: from 2024.1.0 before 2024.1.13038, from 2024.2.0 before 2024.2.9482, from 2024.3.0 before 2024.3.12766.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in Octopus Server allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via unsanitized input parameters. The vulnerability affects the web interface on both Windows and Linux deployments and can be exploited over the network without user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.1.437, < 2024.1.13038>= 2024.2.101, < 2024.2.9482>= 2024.3.164, < 2024.3.12766CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Octopus Server versionOpen the Octopus web UI, click Help > About, or run 'Octopus.Server.exe --version' from the installation directory, or query the API endpoint /api/system/healthAffected if The installed version is 2024.1.437 through 2024.1.13037, 2024.2.101 through 2024.2.9481, or 2024.3.164 through 2024.3.12765
-
Confirm database typeNavigate to Infrastructure > Databases in the Octopus UI, or inspect the connection string in the Octopus.Server.config file located in the server installation directoryAffected if Octopus Server is configured to use a SQL Server database (the vulnerability is in SQL query handling)
-
Identify accessible API endpointsReview Octopus deployment processes, runbooks, and script modules that accept user-supplied input and could construct SQL queries, check the /api endpoints for any that accept dynamic parametersAffected if Any API endpoint or script module accepts unsanitized input that could be used to inject SQL commands
-
Check for custom SQL stepsReview all Octopus deployment steps and runbooks for custom SQL scripts or steps that interact with the database, examine any third-party step templatesAffected if Custom SQL execution steps or step templates exist that could pass unsanitized variables to database queries
You are affected if your Octopus Server version falls within the three affected ranges AND the server uses a SQL Server database with deployment processes or runbooks that could pass user input to SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.1.130382024.2.94822024.3.12766
Upgrade Octopus Server to versions 2024.1.13038, 2024.2.9482, or 2024.3.12766 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Octopus Server interface using network segmentation or a web application firewall.
2024.1.13038 (for 2024.1.x), 2024.2.9482 (for 2024.2.x), or 2024.3.12766 (for 2024.3.x)
- 1. Identify your current Octopus Server version from the web interface (Help > About) or via the API endpoint /api/serverdiagnostics
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (2024.1.x, 2024.2.x, or 2024.3.x)
- 3. For 2024.1.x versions: Upgrade to version 2024.1.13038 or later
- 4. For 2024.2.x versions: Upgrade to version 2024.2.9482 or later
- 5. For 2024.3.x versions: Upgrade to version 2024.3.12766 or later
- 6. Backup your Octopus Server database before performing the upgrade
- 7. Follow standard Octopus Server upgrade procedure: stop the service, run the installer/upgrade script, verify the service starts successfully
- 8. Confirm the version has been updated by checking Help > About in the web UI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9194 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data