Pdf EditorApplication · Foxit

CVE-2024-9256

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2024.2.3.25184 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Foxit PDF Reader AcroForm Out-Of-Bounds Read Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25267.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Foxit PDF Reader contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in AcroForm handling due to insufficient validation of user-supplied data. The flaw allows reading past the end of an allocated buffer, exposing sensitive memory contents. While this is primarily an information disclosure issue, it can be chained with other vulnerabilities to achieve arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpdate Foxit PDF Reader to the latest version; implement application whitelisting and train users to avoid opening untrusted PDF files from unknown sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pdf EditorApplication
Affected:<= 11.2.10.53951>= 12.0, <= 12.1.7.15526>= 13.0, <= 13.1.3.22478>= 2023.0, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.0, <= 2024.2.3.25184
Pdf ReaderApplication
Affected:<= 2024.2.3.25184

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Foxit PDF Reader installation
    Open Foxit PDF Reader, then go to Help > About Foxit Reader to view the exact version number. Alternatively, locate the executable (FoxitReader.exe) in the installation directory, right-click it, select Properties, and check the Details tab for the Product Version.
    Affected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: <= 2024.2.3.25184 (all earlier versions), 11.2.10.53951 or lower, 12.0 to 12.1.7.15526, 13.0 to 13.1.3.22478, 2023.0 to 2023.3.0.23028, or 2024.0 to 2024.2.3.25184.
  2. Confirm AcroForm feature is in use
    Open any PDF file that contains fillable form fields (AcroForms). In Foxit Reader, look for the Forms toolbar or check if form fields are interactive and fillable. You can also inspect the PDF structure using a tool to confirm /AcroForm dictionary presence.
    Affected if The application processes PDFs with AcroForm dictionaries or interactive form fields, which is the vulnerable component.
  3. Verify file handling context
    Check whether the system routinely opens PDF files from external or untrusted sources. Review recent PDF files accessed by the user, particularly those downloaded from the internet or received via email.
    Affected if Users open PDFs from untrusted sources, increasing the likelihood of encountering a maliciously crafted AcroForm payload.

You are affected if Foxit PDF Reader version is 2024.2.3.25184 or any earlier version AND the application is used to open or process PDF files containing AcroForms.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2024.2.3.25184
Interim mitigation

Update Foxit PDF Reader to the latest version; implement application whitelisting and train users to avoid opening untrusted PDF files from unknown sources.

Fix this in Pdf Editor Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9256 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data