CVE-2024-9468
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA memory corruption vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash PAN-OS due to a crafted packet through the data plane, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Repeated attempts to trigger this condition will result in PAN-OS entering maintenance mode.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash PAN-OS by sending a crafted packet through the data plane, resulting in denial of service. Repeated exploitation causes the system to enter maintenance mode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.2.0, < 10.2.4>= 10.2.5, < 10.2.7>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.4>= 11.0.5, < 11.0.6>= 11.1.0, < 11.1.3= 10.2.4= 10.2.7= 10.2.8= 10.2.9= 10.2.10= 11.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PAN-OS version via CLIRun 'show system info' or 'show version' command on the PAN-OS deviceAffected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: 10.2.0-10.2.10, 11.0.0-11.0.6, 11.1.0-11.1.2 (specifically: 10.2.x where x<11, 11.0.x where x<7, 11.1.x where x<3)
-
Confirm the device is exposed to network trafficVerify that the device management interface or data plane interfaces are directly accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The PAN-OS data plane is reachable from external or untrusted networks without perimeter filtering
-
Check for recent unexpected system crashesReview system logs with 'show system logs' or check for entries indicating 'maintenance mode' or unexpected rebootsAffected if The device has experienced crashes or entered maintenance mode without known cause, especially if exposed to external traffic
You are affected if your PAN-OS version is 10.2.0 through 10.2.10, 11.0.0 through 11.0.6, or 11.1.0 through 11.1.2, and the data plane is network-accessible to unauthenticated attackers
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.2.410.2.711.0.4
Apply the official PAN-OS security patch from Palo Alto Networks. As a temporary workaround, implement network-level filtering to block potentially malicious crafted packets at perimeter devices.
Upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.4, 10.2.7, 11.0.4, or 11.0.6 depending on current branch
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version by checking the device dashboard or using 'show system info' command
- 2. Based on the current version, determine the appropriate fixed release: if on 10.2.0-10.2.3 upgrade to 10.2.4; if on 10.2.5-10.2.6 upgrade to 10.2.7; if on 11.0.0-11.0.3 upgrade to 11.0.4; if on 11.0.5 upgrade to 11.0.6
- 3. Download the corresponding maintenance release from the Palo Alto Networks support portal
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the current configuration using 'export configuration' command
- 5. Upload the upgrade file to the device and initiate the upgrade via Web UI (Device > Software) or CLI (request system software install)
- 6. After upgrade completes, verify the new version is installed and the system is operational
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking the PAN-OS version matches a fixed release (10.2.4, 10.2.7, 11.0.4, or 11.0.6)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9468 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data