CVE-2025-0089
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in multiple locations within the Android Launcher app allows a local attacker to escalate privileges without additional execution privileges or user interaction. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability stemming from improper access control or state validation in the Launcher component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android OS versionCheck the device Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The version is 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 exactly (not a later patch version)
-
Confirm Launcher is the active home screenGo to Settings > Apps > Default apps > Home screen, or run 'pm get-default-home' via ADB shellAffected if The default home screen app is Google's Launcher (com.google.android.apps.nexuslauncher or com.android.launcher)
-
Check if Launcher has system-level permissionsInspect the Launcher app permissions in Settings > Apps > Launcher > Permissions, or run 'dumpsys package com.google.android.apps.nexuslauncher' via ADB shellAffected if The Launcher holds elevated permissions that could be exploited for privilege escalation
A user is affected if running Android 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 with Google's Launcher as the default home screen application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor security patch for this vulnerability to the affected Launcher application; this is a code-level logic fix requiring vendor-provided updates rather than configuration changes.
Latest Android security update for your device (Android 13/14/15) - contact device vendor for specific patch level
- Check your current Android version and security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android version
- Contact your device manufacturer or carrier to obtain the latest Android security update
- Apply the latest available security update for Android 13, 14, or 15 as applicable to your device
- Verify the security patch level has been updated after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0089 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data