CVE-2025-0140
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ App on macOS devices enables a locally authenticated non administrative user to disable the app even if the GlobalProtect app configuration would not normally permit them to do so. The GlobalProtect app on Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome OS and GlobalProtect UWP app are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a privilege assignment vulnerability in the GlobalProtect App on macOS where incorrect file permissions or access controls allow locally authenticated non-administrative users to disable the VPN client, bypassing configuration settings that should prevent such actions. The vulnerability stems from improper restriction of app termination capabilities for standard users on macOS systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GlobalProtect App is installed on macOSOpen Terminal and run: ls /Applications/ | grep -i globalprotect or check /Applications folder for Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect.appAffected if GlobalProtect.app exists in /Applications
-
Identify the installed GlobalProtect versionRight-click GlobalProtect.app > Get Info, or run: defaults read /Applications/GlobalProtect.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleVersionAffected if Unable to determine version or version is unknown/older
-
Check file ownership and permissions on GlobalProtect.appRun: ls -la /Applications/GlobalProtect.app/Contents/ and ls -la /Applications/GlobalProtect.app/Contents/MacOS/Affected if Files are owned by a standard user or have overly permissive settings (e.g., world-writable or owned by non-admin users)
-
Verify access control restrictions on app terminationRun: ls -le /Applications/GlobalProtect.app to check for extended attributes, or inspect codesign entitlements: codesign -d --entitlements - /Applications/GlobalProtect.app 2>/dev/null | grep -i killAffected if No proper restrictions exist preventing standard users from sending termination signals to the app
A user is affected if GlobalProtect is installed on macOS and standard (non-administrative) local users can successfully terminate or disable the VPN client despite configuration settings intended to prevent this.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-provided patch for GlobalProtect App on macOS when released; in the interim, monitor for unauthorized app disablement attempts and consider restricting local user privileges where feasible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0140 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data