Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2025-0224

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in Provision-ISR SH-4050A-2, SH-4100A-2L(MM), SH-8100A-2L(MM), SH-16200A-2(1U), SH-16200A-5(1U) and NVR5-8200PX up to 20241220. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /server.js. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /server.js file of multiple Provision-ISR NVR models (SH-4050A-2, SH-4100A-2L, SH-8100A-2L, SH-16200A-2/5, NVR5-8200PX) allowing remote attackers to access sensitive information. The exploit has been publicly disclosed, increasing exploitation risk.

MitigationApply the latest vendor firmware update from Provision-ISR for affected NVR models. If no patch is available, isolate devices behind a firewall and disable unnecessary network exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the NVR model
    Access the device web interface or check the device label/documentation to confirm the exact model number (SH-4050A-2, SH-4100A-2L, SH-8100A-2L, SH-16200A-2/5, or NVR5-8200PX)
    Affected if The model number matches one of the affected models listed in the CVE
  2. Verify the web server is running
    Attempt to access the device login page or /server.js endpoint over HTTP/HTTPS (e.g., http://<device-ip>/server.js) using curl or a web browser
    Affected if The device responds with content, indicating the web server is active and potentially exposing the vulnerable endpoint
  3. Check for information disclosure in /server.js
    Inspect the response from accessing /server.js - look for hardcoded credentials, API keys, internal paths, or configuration details that should not be publicly visible
    Affected if The /server.js file returns sensitive information such as credentials, internal network details, or configuration data
  4. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the NVR device is directly accessible from the internet (public IP) or behind a proper firewall. Check router/firewall port forwarding rules for the device's HTTP/HTTPS ports
    Affected if The device web interface is accessible from the internet without VPN or firewall restrictions
  5. Confirm firmware version
    Log into the device admin panel and navigate to System > About or System > Firmware to check the installed firmware version. Compare against any vendor release notes
    Affected if The firmware version cannot be confirmed as patched or is older than the latest available version from Provision-ISR

A user is affected if they own one of the listed NVR models with the web interface accessible (either locally or exposed) and the /server.js file returns sensitive information that should not be disclosed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the latest vendor firmware update from Provision-ISR for affected NVR models. If no patch is available, isolate devices behind a firewall and disable unnecessary network exposure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0224 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data