CVE-2025-0355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in NEC Corporation Aterm WG2600HS Ver.1.7.2 and earlier, WF1200CRS Ver.1.6.0 and earlier, WG1200CRS Ver.1.5.0 and earlier, GB1200PE Ver.1.3.0 and earlier, WG2600HP4 Ver.1.4.2 and earlier, WG2600HM4 Ver.1.4.2 and earlier, WG2600HS2 Ver.1.3.2 and earlier, WX3000HP Ver.2.4.2 and earlier and WX4200D5 Ver.1.2.4 and earlier allows a attacker to get a Wi-Fi password via the network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing authentication vulnerability in NEC Aterm router series allows unauthenticated attackers on the network to retrieve Wi-Fi passwords. The critical function (Wi-Fi password retrieval) lacks authentication controls, enabling any network-adjacent attacker to obtain sensitive credentials without authorization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NEC Aterm router modelLog into the router administration page or check the device label to confirm the model number is an NEC Aterm series routerAffected if The device is not an NEC Aterm router - not affected
-
Determine firmware versionAccess the router admin panel (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1), navigate to System or Status settings, and record the firmware version displayedAffected if Unable to determine firmware version - manual verification required
-
Verify Wi-Fi password retrieval requires authenticationFrom a browser on a device connected to the network (not logged into admin), attempt to access common Wi-Fi password retrieval endpoints such as http://[router-ip]//cgi-bin/wlancfg or check if the wireless settings page prompts for login credentialsAffected if Wi-Fi passwords or WPS PIN codes are displayed without requiring admin login - AFFECTED
-
Test management interface exposureAccess the router login page from an unauthenticated client on the LAN and confirm whether a valid session or login is required to view or export wireless configurationAffected if Wireless SSID and password fields are visible or exportable without authentication - AFFECTED
The environment is affected if the NEC Aterm router exposes Wi-Fi credentials (SSID/password) through its web interface without requiring administrator authentication, allowing any network-adjacent user to retrieve sensitive wireless keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected router firmware to versions that include authentication requirements for critical functions. If updates are unavailable, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the router's management interface.
Each model has a specific fixed version: WG2600HS to Ver.1.7.3 or later, WF1200CRS to Ver.1.6.1 or later, WG1200CRS to Ver.1.5.1 or later, GB1200PE to Ver.1.3.1 or later, WG2600HP4 to Ver.1.4.3 or later, WG2600HM4 to Ver.1.4.3 or later, WG2600HS2 to Ver.1.3.3 or later, WX3000HP to Ver.2.4.3 or later
- 1. Identify your Aterm router model from the affected list: WG2600HS, WF1200CRS, WG1200CRS, GB1200PE, WG2600HP4, WG2600HM4, WG2600HS2, WX3000HP, or WX4200D5
- 2. Access the router's administration interface via web browser (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1)
- 3. Navigate to the firmware update or system settings section
- 4. Check the current firmware version under system information or status
- 5. Download the latest firmware version from NEC's official support page at jpn.nec.com for your specific model
- 6. In the firmware update section, upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the update
- 7. Wait for the update to complete (do not power off the router)
- 8. After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated to a version newer than the vulnerable version for your model
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data