CVE-2025-0361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDuring an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communications, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed for unauthenticated username enumeration through the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames through the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API in Axis Communications devices. This information disclosure flaw could facilitate brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks by enabling attackers to discover valid user accounts before attempting password attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.11.0, < 12.3.56< 11.11.141CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Axis OS versionAccess the device web interface or use the VAPIX API to query the system information (e.g., GET /axis-cgi/basicdeviceinfo.cgi) and retrieve the firmware/OS version fieldAffected if The installed version is >= 11.11.0 and < 12.3.56, or any version < 11.11.141 for the 2024 release branch
-
Confirm the device is an Axis productVerify the device is an Axis Communications product by checking the manufacturer field in the device info or identifying the Axis branding in the web interfaceAffected if The device is not an Axis Communications device (this CVE only applies to Axis products)
-
Determine if SSH Management API is exposedCheck if the VAPIX SSH Management endpoint (typically /axis-cgi/sshmanagement.cgi) is reachable over the network from an unauthenticated perspectiveAffected if The SSH Management API endpoint is accessible without authentication
-
Test for username enumeration behaviorSend unauthenticated requests to the SSH Management API with different usernames and observe whether the response differs between valid and invalid usernames (e.g., different error messages, response codes, or timing)Affected if The API returns distinguishable responses that reveal whether a username exists in the system
The environment is affected if it is an Axis device running Axis OS versions 11.11.0 through 12.3.56 (or < 11.11.141 for 2024 branch) with an accessible SSH Management API that exposes username enumeration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.11.14112.3.56
Implement proper authentication enforcement and rate limiting on the SSH Management API to prevent unauthenticated username enumeration. Consider returning consistent responses for both valid and invalid usernames to eliminate enumeration vectors.
Axis OS 12.3.56 (or later) or Axis OS 2024 11.11.141 (or later)
- 1. Identify the current Axis OS version running on the affected device
- 2. Determine which Axis OS branch the device is running (main release or 2024 release)
- 3. For devices on Axis OS 2024: Upgrade to version 11.11.141 or later
- 4. For devices on main Axis OS (11.11.0+): Upgrade to version 12.3.56 or later
- 5. After upgrade, verify the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API no longer returns distinct responses for valid vs invalid usernames
- 6. Confirm the fix by reviewing Axis security advisories for CVE-2025-0361
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data