CVE-2025-0371
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe JetElements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via several widgets in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.2.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JetElements WordPress plugin fails to properly sanitize user-supplied attributes in multiple widgets and escape them on output, allowing authenticated contributors+ to inject persistent JavaScript payloads. These scripts execute in victim browsers whenever the injected pages are accessed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify JetElements plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate the JetElements by Crocoblock plugin. Note the installed version number displayed.Affected if JetElements is installed and the version listed is below 2.7.3 (for example, 2.7.2, 2.7.1, or earlier)
-
Confirm the exact version numberCheck the plugins list for the version column, or if you have file system access, inspect the plugin main file header in /wp-content/plugins/jet-elements/ to read the Version field.Affected if The Version field reads less than 2.7.3
-
Identify user accounts with contributor-level access or higherIn WordPress admin, go to Users and review the role column. Look for any accounts assigned the Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator roles.Affected if There exists at least one user account with Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator role (since these roles can access the widget editor)
-
Inspect pages containing JetElements widgets for injected scriptsEdit a page or post that contains JetElements widgets. In Elementor or the classic editor, review widget settings for any attribute fields (such as custom CSS classes, headings, or link URLs) that contain unusual characters or appear Base64-encoded. Alternatively, export page content as XML and search the raw data for script tags, javascript:, or onload/onerror event handlers within JetElements widget shortcodes.Affected if Any JetElements widget settings contain raw script tags, javascript: URIs, or HTML event handler attributes (onclick, onload, onerror, etc.) that were not intentionally added by an administrator
You are affected if JetElements is installed at a version below 2.7.3 AND at least one contributor-level or higher user account exists in the WordPress site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.7.3
Update JetElements to the latest version and audit existing pages for malicious widget configurations. Enforce least-privilege on contributor-level accounts until patched.
JetElements version 2.7.3 or later
- Log in to WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find JetElements in the plugin list
- Check if an update is available (version 2.7.3 or later)
- If update available, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version
- If no automatic update, manually download JetElements version 2.7.3 or later from crocoblock.com
- Deactivate the current JetElements plugin
- Delete the existing JetElements plugin
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0371 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0371 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data