CVE-2025-0423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the "bestinformed Web" application, some user input was not properly sanitized. This leads to multiple unauthenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. An unauthenticated attacker is able to compromise the sessions of users on the server by injecting JavaScript code into their session using an "Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting". The attacker is then able to ride the session of those users and can abuse their privileges on the "bestinformed Web" application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe 'bestinformed Web' application suffers from multiple unauthenticated stored XSS vulnerabilities where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before storage and display. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the browsers of other users, enabling session hijacking and privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm 'bestinformed Web' application presenceSearch for the application in web server directories, check running web services, or review installed packages. Look for directories or services named 'bestinformed' or associated with the product.Affected if The application is present in the environment
-
Identify the application entry pointsLocate the application's web accessible paths (URLs). Check web server configuration files (Apache/nginx/IIS configs) for 'bestinformed' virtual hosts or aliases.Affected if The application is web-accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Locate user input fieldsReview the application's pages for forms or input mechanisms that accept user data such as login fields, registration forms, contact forms, comment fields, search inputs, or profile update fields.Affected if User-supplied input fields exist in the application
-
Test for stored XSS vulnerabilityUsing a browser or HTTP client, submit a benign XSS payload such as <script>alert('XSS')</script> or <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')> into visible input fields. Then navigate away and return to the page or view the stored data to check if the payload executes or is rendered unsanitized.Affected if The injected payload is stored and executed/displayed unescaped when the page is revisited
-
Verify exploitability without authenticationAttempt the XSS injection described above without logging in or authenticating to the application.Affected if The stored XSS is triggered in the browser of another user without requiring authentication
If the 'bestinformed Web' application is present and user input fields store and reflect unsanitized data back to users, the environment is affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and output encoding (context-aware escaping) for all user-supplied data, and consider deploying a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate XSS execution.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data