CVE-2025-0457
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe airPASS from NetVision Information has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with regular privileges to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in airPASS from NetVision Information allows remote authenticated attackers with regular (non-privileged) user accounts to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm airPASS installationLocate airPASS application files, binaries, or services on the system. Check for airPASS processes running or airPASS services listening on network ports.Affected if airPASS from NetVision Information is installed and running
-
Identify airPASS versionCheck the installed airPASS version through application files, binary metadata, or the application's version information interface if accessible. Compare against any released patch versions.Affected if Version cannot be determined or is earlier than the patched release
-
Verify network exposureDetermine if airPASS is accessible from network locations. Check firewall rules, network bindings, and whether the application listens on external interfaces versus localhost only.Affected if airPASS is reachable from network or untrusted sources
-
Review authentication configurationExamine airPASS authentication settings and user account configurations to confirm whether regular (non-privileged) user accounts can access the application.Affected if Regular authenticated users are permitted access to airPASS
-
Inspect for command injection indicatorsReview application logs, system logs, and audit logs for unusual commands, shell executions, or suspicious input patterns that may indicate exploitation of the vulnerability.Affected if Evidence of unauthorized command execution or abnormal application behavior is found
If airPASS is exposed to network access and allows authentication for regular users, the environment may be affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch immediately. Until then, restrict network access to airPASS, implement strict input validation on all user-supplied parameters, and run the application with least-privilege operating system accounts.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0457 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0457 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data