Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2025-0593

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The vulnerability may allow a remote low priviledged attacker to run arbitrary shell commands by using lower-level functions to interact with the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in a network-connected device (likely IoT, embedded system, or network hardware). A low-privilege attacker can execute arbitrary shell commands by exploiting lower-level functions that improperly handle user input, indicating a command injection or similar input validation flaw.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches immediately. If no patch exists, restrict network access to the affected interface and disable any unnecessary command interfaces or APIs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and firmware version
    Locate the device label, web interface status page, or use commands like `cat /proc/version`, `uname -a`, `fw_printenv`, or vendor-specific tools to retrieve the exact firmware version installed
    Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or compared to any patched release
  2. Identify exposed network services and interfaces
    Run port scans (nmap) on the device, check for open ports (netstat -tulpn), and review the device's service configuration for exposed HTTP, telnet, SSH, or API endpoints accessible over the network
    Affected if Any network-accessible management or function interface is exposed to untrusted networks
  3. Verify authentication requirements on exposed interfaces
    Attempt to access each identified service without credentials, check for default credentials in documentation, and review authentication configuration files or web server settings
    Affected if Interfaces can be accessed without authentication or use weak/default credentials
  4. Check for command injection entry points in function interfaces
    Review web interfaces, API endpoints, or CLI tools for parameters that accept user input and could be passed to shell execution functions; test with benign characters like ; | ` or $() in input fields if testing is authorized
    Affected if User-supplied input in any interface parameter is not validated before being used in system calls
  5. Identify user account privilege levels
    Review user accounts configured on the device, check group memberships (cat /etc/passwd, /etc/group on embedded Linux), and verify the lowest-privilege account permissions
    Affected if Low-privilege or guest accounts exist and can access the vulnerable interface
  6. Check for unexpected shell access or command execution
    Review device logs (/var/log/, syslog), check for unusual processes (ps aux), and look for unauthorized shell sessions or cron jobs
    Affected if Evidence exists of arbitrary command execution or shell access from low-privilege accounts

The device is likely affected if it has any network-accessible interface where low-privilege authenticated users can submit input that is processed by system shell functions without strict validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches immediately. If no patch exists, restrict network access to the affected interface and disable any unnecessary command interfaces or APIs.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0593 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0593 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data