dbcve.org
Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-0606

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Logo Software Inc. Logo Cloud allows Forceful Browsing, Resource Leak Exposure. This issue affects Logo Cloud: before 0.67.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · low confidence

This is an authorization bypass vulnerability in Logo Cloud where user-controlled input is used as a key for making authorization decisions. An attacker can manipulate this input to perform forceful browsing (accessing resources by directly specifying their identifiers) and expose resource leakages (accessing information about resources that should not be visible). The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 0.67.

MitigationUpgrade Logo Cloud to version 0.67 or later. Additionally, review and refactor authorization logic to ensure all access decisions are based on server-side validated context rather than user-supplied keys, and implement proper bounds checking on resource access requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Logo Cloud installation
    Check your environment for Logo Cloud components, typically installed as a web application or service. Look for directories named 'logo-cloud' or files containing 'logo-cloud' in their metadata.
    Affected if Logo Cloud is present in the environment
  2. Determine installed Logo Cloud version
    Locate the version file or metadata for your Logo Cloud installation. Common locations include a version.json, package.json, or the application metadata. Compare the version number to 0.67.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.67 or cannot be determined to be 0.67 or higher
  3. Inspect authorization logic for user-supplied keys
    Review the application source code or configuration for authorization decision points. Search for code paths where user-provided parameters (query parameters, form inputs, headers) are used directly as keys to access control checks without server-side validation.
    Affected if Authorization logic uses user-controlled input as keys for access decisions without proper server-side validation
  4. Check for resource access endpoints
    Identify endpoints or functionality that handle resource access based on user-specified identifiers. Look for API routes or handlers that accept resource IDs, keys, or names as parameters.
    Affected if The application exposes endpoints that accept user-supplied resource identifiers for access checks

You are affected if Logo Cloud is installed with a version lower than 0.67 and the application uses user-supplied input as authorization keys without server-side validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Logo Cloud to version 0.67 or later. Additionally, review and refactor authorization logic to ensure all access decisions are based on server-side validated context rather than user-supplied keys, and implement proper bounds checking on resource access requests.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Logo Cloud version 0.67 or later

  1. Upgrade Logo Cloud to version 0.67 or later to remediate the authorization bypass vulnerability
  2. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and confirming all services are operational
  3. Test that the authorization controls are properly enforced after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0606 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data