CVE-2025-0624
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in grub2. During the network boot process, when trying to search for the configuration file, grub copies data from a user controlled environment variable into an internal buffer using the grub_strcpy() function. During this step, it fails to consider the environment variable length when allocating the internal buffer, resulting in an out-of-bounds write. If correctly exploited, this issue may result in remote code execution through the same network segment grub is searching for the boot information, which can be used to by-pass secure boot protections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in GRUB2 during network boot where the code copies data from a user-controlled environment variable into an internal buffer using grub_strcpy() without checking the variable's length, resulting in an out-of-bounds write that can enable remote code execution and bypass secure boot protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm GRUB2 is used for network bootingInspect system boot configuration files in /boot/efi/EFI/*/ and check for GRUB2 (grubx64.efi, grub.efi) being used as the primary bootloader. Look for network boot entries in grub.cfg or boot entries configured for PXE/iPXE.Affected if GRUB2 is the primary bootloader and network boot is configured or available
-
Identify installed GRUB2 versionRun 'grub2-install --version' or check the RPM/DEB package version (e.g., 'rpm -q grub2' or 'dpkg -l grub-pc'). For EFI systems, check the version embedded in the EFI binary.Affected if The installed GRUB2 version is older than the patched version (no specific version in advisory, compare to vendor patch when available)
-
Verify network boot is enabledCheck for PXE/iPXE configuration files in /tftpboot, /pxelinux.cfg, or DHCP options pointing to network boot images. Examine DHCP/BOOTP responses for bootfile fields.Affected if Network boot (PXE/iPXE) is enabled and GRUB2 loads over the network
-
Inspect GRUB network configuration for environment variable handlingExamine GRUB network configuration files (*.cfg in network boot paths) for 'export' statements or environment variables that could be set from network-provided values. Check for 'net_linux_env' or similar network-provided variable usage.Affected if GRUB is configured to accept or process environment variables from network boot sources
-
Check for secure boot statusVerify secure boot state using 'mokutil --sb-state' or check UEFI firmware settings. This vulnerability can bypass secure boot protections.Affected if Secure boot is enabled (the bypass impact applies)
A system is affected if it uses GRUB2 for network boot (PXE/iPXE) and processes user-controlled environment variables from network sources, with an unpatched GRUB2 version that lacks proper buffer length validation before grub_strcpy() calls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataPatch GRUB2 to properly validate and allocate buffer size based on environment variable length before copying. Network segmentation may limit exposure from malicious boot configuration requests.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0624 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.netapp.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0624 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data