CVE-2025-0689
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen reading data from disk, the grub's UDF filesystem module utilizes the user controlled data length metadata to allocate its internal buffers. In certain scenarios, while iterating through disk sectors, it assumes the read size from the disk is always smaller than the allocated buffer size which is not guaranteed. A crafted filesystem image may lead to a heap-based buffer overflow resulting in critical data to be corrupted, resulting in the risk of arbitrary code execution by-passing secure boot protections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGRUB's UDF filesystem module uses user-controlled length metadata from the filesystem image to allocate internal buffers. During disk sector iteration, the code assumes the read size is always smaller than the allocated buffer without validating this assumption. A specially crafted UDF filesystem image can cause a heap-based buffer overflow by providing metadata that results in a smaller buffer than the actual read size, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution and bypassing Secure Boot protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check GRUB2 versionRun 'grub-install --version' or 'dpkg -l | grep grub' (Debian/Ubuntu), 'rpm -qa | grep grub' (RHEL/Fedora), or check /boot/grub/i386-pc or x86_64-efi directory for version fileAffected if Installed version is 2.12 or lower
-
Identify UDF filesystem moduleLook for 'udf' module file in GRUB modules directory (typically /boot/grub/i386-pc/ or /boot/grub/x86_64-efi/); list with 'ls -la /boot/grub/*/udf*.mod'Affected if UDF module file exists in GRUB modules directory
-
Verify UDF module is loaded or availableCheck GRUB configuration (typically /boot/grub/grub.cfg or /etc/grub.d/) for 'insmod udf' or 'module /udf.mod' statements, or examine GRUB menu entries for UDF-related commandsAffected if GRUB configuration loads or references the UDF module
-
Check if system can mount UDF imagesReview GRUB configuration for 'mount' commands or UDF filesystem access patterns; check if any boot entries or rescue media reference UDF-mounted volumesAffected if GRUB environment includes configuration to mount or access UDF filesystems
-
Determine Secure Boot statusRun 'mokutil --sb-state' (Linux) or check UEFI firmware settings for 'Secure Boot' status; on Windows use 'msinfo32' and look for 'Secure Boot State'Affected if Secure Boot is DISABLED (vulnerability can be exploited without this protection)
System is affected if running GRUB2 version 2.12 or lower with the UDF module loaded/enabled and Secure Boot is disabled or not enforcing bootloader integrity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the official GRUB security patch when available. In the interim, avoid mounting untrusted UDF filesystem images and ensure Secure Boot only loads trusted, signed bootloader images. Consider verifying UDF filesystem integrity before mounting in GRUB environments.
Grub2 version greater than 2.12 (consult your distribution's security advisory for the exact fixed version)
- 1. Identify the current Grub2 version installed on the system using: rpm -q grub2-common or dpkg -l | grep grub2
- 2. Check for available security updates for Grub2 in your distribution's package repository
- 3. Apply the distribution-specific security patch: for RHEL/Fedora use 'dnf update grub2' or 'yum update grub2', for Debian/Ubuntu use 'apt update && apt install grub2'
- 4. If using UEFI with Secure Boot, ensure the updated Grub binaries are properly signed with a valid signature
- 5. After updating, regenerate Grub configuration files if needed using 'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg' (or the appropriate path for your system)
- 6. Reboot the system to load the updated Grub version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0689 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0689 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data