Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2025-0694

MEDIUM · 6.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insufficient path validation in CODESYS Control allows low privileged attackers with physical access to gain full filesystem access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CODESYS Control contains an insufficient path validation vulnerability (likely path traversal) that allows low-privileged attackers with physical access to escape directory restrictions and gain full filesystem access, enabling read/write of sensitive files, configuration data, and potentially executable code.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available; restrict physical access to control systems; implement strict file system permissions and input validation; consider compensating controls like network segmentation and monitoring.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm CODESYS Control installation
    Locate CODESYS Control installation directory (commonly in C:\Program Files\CODESYS or C:\Program Files (x86)\CODESYS on Windows, or /opt/codesys on Linux). Verify the presence of the CODESYS Control runtime components and configuration files.
    Affected if CODESYS Control is not installed on the system.
  2. Identify installed CODESYS Control version
    Check the version of CODESYS Control by examining the installation's version metadata. On Windows, right-click the main executable (such as CODESYSControl.exe) and view Properties > Details, or run the CODESYS installer with version query flags. On Linux, check the installed RPM/DEB package or examine version files in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is older than the patched version.
  3. Verify file access functionality is enabled
    Inspect CODESYS Control configuration files (typically with .cfg or .xml extensions in the installation directory or AppData folder) for settings related to file system access, path handling, or file transfer features. Look for parameters enabling WebVisu, file browsing, or external file operations.
    Affected if File access or path handling features are enabled in the configuration.
  4. Examine directory restriction settings
    Review CODESYS Control runtime configuration for any defined file access restrictions, sandboxing settings, or directory confinement parameters. Check if the system enforces limited filesystem access boundaries for the runtime process.
    Affected if No directory restrictions are configured, or restrictions rely solely on built-in path validation without vendor patches.
  5. Assess physical access controls
    Evaluate physical security controls on the host running CODESYS Control. Determine whether low-privileged users or unauthorized personnel can directly access the hardware, console, or removable media ports.
    Affected if Physical access to the control system is not restricted to trusted personnel.

The environment is affected if CODESYS Control is installed with a version prior to the vendor patch, has file access or path handling features enabled, and the system is physically accessible to low-privileged users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available; restrict physical access to control systems; implement strict file system permissions and input validation; consider compensating controls like network segmentation and monitoring.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0694 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0694 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data