CVE-2025-0832
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting Project Gantt in ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Project Gantt component of ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code that gets stored on the server and executes in the browsers of users who view the affected Project Gantt data. This affects releases R2022x through R2024x.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r2022x, <= r2024xCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ENOVIA installation and versionLocate the ENOVIA Collaborative Industry Innovator installation and determine the exact version number. Check the application version in the About section or version file.Affected if The installed version is R2022x, R2023x, or R2024x (any release within this range).
-
Verify Project Gantt component is accessibleConfirm the Project Gantt feature is enabled and accessible within the ENOVIA environment. Check user permissions and component status.Affected if Project Gantt component is enabled and users can view or create Gantt charts.
-
Inspect stored Project Gantt data for script tagsReview the database or file storage where Project Gantt data is saved. Look for any records containing HTML script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handler attributes in Gantt-related fields.Affected if Stored Project Gantt data contains unsanitized user-supplied content with script tags or JavaScript event handlers.
-
Review recent Gantt chart modificationsCheck audit logs or modification history for Project Gantt entries created or modified around the time of potential exploitation. Look for entries with unusual characters or encoded content.Affected if There are recent Gantt entries containing potentially malicious payload patterns.
A user is affected if they are running ENOVIA R2022x through R2024x with the Project Gantt component enabled and have stored or viewed Gantt data containing unsanitized script content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in Project Gantt. Apply vendor-provided patches when released. Consider Content Security Policy headers as defense-in-depth.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0832 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data