Privilege Management For WindowsApplication · Beyondtrust

CVE-2025-0889

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 25.2 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Prior to 25.2, a local authenticated attacker can elevate privileges on a system with Privilege Management for Windows installed, via the manipulation of COM objects under certain circumstances where an EPM policy allows for automatic privilege elevation of a user process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A local authenticated attacker can elevate privileges on systems with Privilege Management for Windows versions prior to 25.2 by manipulating COM objects under specific conditions where an EPM (Endpoint Privilege Management) policy permits automatic privilege elevation of user processes.

MitigationUpgrade Privilege Management for Windows to version 25.2 or later, and review EPM policies to restrict automatic privilege elevation to minimize attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Privilege Management For WindowsApplication
Affected:< 25.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Privilege Management for Windows is installed
    Check for the presence of BeyondTrust or Privilege Management for Windows software via Programs and Features, or look for the pbgservice.exe process running on the system
    Affected if The software is not installed, the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Determine the installed version of Privilege Management for Windows
    Locate the version information in the installed program directory or via system information tools, then compare the version number to 25.2
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 25.2 (for example, 25.1.x, 24.x, or earlier)
  3. Identify configured EPM policies
    Access the Endpoint Privilege Management policy configuration console or exported policy files to review which EPM policies are active on the system
    Affected if No EPM policies are defined, the vulnerability cannot be exploited
  4. Check if automatic privilege elevation is permitted
    Review the active EPM policies to determine if any policy allows automatic elevation of user processes without user prompt or confirmation
    Affected if An EPM policy permits automatic privilege elevation of user processes, making the system vulnerable to the COM object manipulation attack

A system is affected if Privilege Management for Windows versions prior to 25.2 is installed AND an EPM policy configured on the system permits automatic privilege elevation of user processes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 25.2 or later
Fixed in 25.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Privilege Management for Windows to version 25.2 or later, and review EPM policies to restrict automatic privilege elevation to minimize attack surface.

Recommended fix High confidence

25.2

  1. 1. Verify current Privilege Management for Windows version by checking the installed software or via the Beyond Trust dashboard
  2. 2. Download Privilege Management for Windows version 25.2 or later from the Beyond Trust support portal
  3. 3. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production systems
  4. 4. Apply the upgrade to all systems running versions prior to 25.2
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new version is installed

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Privilege Management For Windows Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0889 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0889 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data