CVE-2025-0970
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Zenvia Movidesk up to 25.01.22. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /Account/Login. The manipulation of the argument ReturnUrl leads to open redirect. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 25.01.22.245a473c54 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn open redirect vulnerability exists in the Zenvia Movidesk login page (/Account/Login). The ReturnUrl parameter is not properly validated, allowing attackers to craft malicious URLs that redirect users to arbitrary external sites after authentication. This can be leveraged in phishing attacks to steal credentials or deliver malicious content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 25.01.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Movidesk versionAccess the Movidesk admin panel or check the application footer/dashboard for the version number displayed (typically shown as something like 25.01.XX)Affected if The version displayed is 25.01.22 or lower (any version up to and including 25.01.22)
-
Verify the login endpoint is exposedConfirm that the /Account/Login path is accessible in your Movidesk instance (navigate to your Movidesk URL followed by /Account/Login)Affected if The login page loads successfully at this path, meaning the vulnerable endpoint is exposed
-
Test the ReturnUrl parameter for open redirectUse a browser or curl to request the login page with a ReturnUrl parameter pointing to an external domain, for example: https://your-movidesk-url/Account/Login?ReturnUrl=http://evil.com. Observe whether the application redirects to the external domain after login or displays the malicious URL in the response.Affected if After authentication, the user is redirected to the URL specified in ReturnUrl, especially if it points to an external/untrusted domain
-
Check for WAF or proxy logging of suspicious ReturnUrl valuesReview WAF logs, application logs, or reverse proxy logs for requests to /Account/Login containing ReturnUrl parameters with external domains (http:// or https:// domains different from your own Movidesk domain)Affected if Logs show requests with external ReturnUrl values, indicating active probing or attempted exploitation
You are affected if your Movidesk version is 25.01.22 or lower AND the /Account/Login endpoint accepts external URLs in the ReturnUrl parameter, allowing unvalidated redirects to arbitrary domains.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Movidesk to version 25.01.22.245a473c54 or later. Until the upgrade is applied, implement WAF rules to validate and sanitize the ReturnUrl parameter, restricting it to trusted domains only.
25.01.22.245a473c54
- Create a backup of the current Movidesk database and application files before proceeding with the upgrade
- Download Movidesk version 25.01.22.245a473c54 from the official Zenvia vendor source
- Stop the Movidesk application services
- Deploy the upgraded version 25.01.22.245a473c54 to the production environment
- Restart the Movidesk application services
- Verify the application is functioning correctly and the ReturnUrl parameter on /Account/Login is now properly validated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0970 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0970 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data